Correction: Why has the number of scientific retractions increased? (PLoS ONE)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Original language	English (US)
Journal	PloS one
Volume	8
Issue number	7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1371/annotation/0d28db18-e117-4804-b1bc-e2da285103ac
State	Published - Jul 19 2013
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

@article{7c245a9981eb472ab7c3961a9aa965af,

title = "Correction: Why has the number of scientific retractions increased? (PLoS ONE)",

author = "Steen, \{R. Grant\} and Arturo Casadevall and Fang, \{Ferric C.\}",

year = "2013",

month = jul,

day = "19",

doi = "10.1371/annotation/0d28db18-e117-4804-b1bc-e2da285103ac",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "8",

journal = "PloS one",

issn = "1932-6203",

publisher = "Public Library of Science",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correction

T2 - Why has the number of scientific retractions increased? (PLoS ONE)

AU - Steen, R. Grant

AU - Casadevall, Arturo

AU - Fang, Ferric C.

PY - 2013/7/19

Y1 - 2013/7/19

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84897877612

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84897877612#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1371/annotation/0d28db18-e117-4804-b1bc-e2da285103ac

DO - 10.1371/annotation/0d28db18-e117-4804-b1bc-e2da285103ac

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:84897877612

SN - 1932-6203

VL - 8

JO - PloS one

JF - PloS one

IS - 7

ER -