TY - JOUR
T1 - Coordinated specialty care discharge, transition, and step-down policies, practices, and concerns
T2 - Staff and client perspectives
AU - Jones, Nev
AU - Gius, Becky
AU - Daley, Tamara
AU - George, Preethy
AU - Rosenblatt, Abram
AU - Shern, David
N1 - Funding Information:
The research described in this article is part of a larger, longitudinal, mixed-methods study evaluating the implementation and outcomes of CSC services that are supported at least in part by Mental Health Block Grant (MHBG) 10% set aside funds (29). Additional details regarding study methodology and design are provided in an online supplement to this article.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/5
Y1 - 2020/5
N2 - Objective: In recent years, optimizing the process of transition and discharge from coordinated specialty care (CSC), a program that provides early intervention in psychosis, has emerged as an important focus area for program administrators, clinicians, and policy makers. To explore existing CSC policies and practices and to understand frontline provider and client views on discharge, the authors conducted a comprehensive analysis of staff and client interview data from the Mental Health Block Grant 10% Set-Aside Study. Methods: Data from 66 interviews with groups of CSC providers and administrators representing 36 sites and 22 states were analyzed, as well as data from interviews with 82 CSC clients at 34 sites. Transcripts were coded by using systematic content analyses. Results: Analyses of data from providers and administrators showed the heterogeneity of CSC program practices and strategies regarding discharge and highlighted a range of concerns related to postdischarge service accessibility and quality. Analysis of data from client interviews reflected the heterogeneity of transition challenges that clients confront. A significant number of participants reported concerns about their readiness for discharge. Conclusions: CSC discharge policies and practices vary across CSC programs and states. Frequent clinician and client concerns about optimal program length, transition, and postdischarge services highlight the importance of sustained policy and research efforts to develop evidence-informed practice guidelines and possible modifications to the time-limited CSC model that currently dominates the field.
AB - Objective: In recent years, optimizing the process of transition and discharge from coordinated specialty care (CSC), a program that provides early intervention in psychosis, has emerged as an important focus area for program administrators, clinicians, and policy makers. To explore existing CSC policies and practices and to understand frontline provider and client views on discharge, the authors conducted a comprehensive analysis of staff and client interview data from the Mental Health Block Grant 10% Set-Aside Study. Methods: Data from 66 interviews with groups of CSC providers and administrators representing 36 sites and 22 states were analyzed, as well as data from interviews with 82 CSC clients at 34 sites. Transcripts were coded by using systematic content analyses. Results: Analyses of data from providers and administrators showed the heterogeneity of CSC program practices and strategies regarding discharge and highlighted a range of concerns related to postdischarge service accessibility and quality. Analysis of data from client interviews reflected the heterogeneity of transition challenges that clients confront. A significant number of participants reported concerns about their readiness for discharge. Conclusions: CSC discharge policies and practices vary across CSC programs and states. Frequent clinician and client concerns about optimal program length, transition, and postdischarge services highlight the importance of sustained policy and research efforts to develop evidence-informed practice guidelines and possible modifications to the time-limited CSC model that currently dominates the field.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084179879&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85084179879&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1176/appi.ps.201900514
DO - 10.1176/appi.ps.201900514
M3 - Review article
C2 - 32188363
AN - SCOPUS:85084179879
SN - 1075-2730
VL - 71
SP - 487
EP - 497
JO - Psychiatric Services
JF - Psychiatric Services
IS - 5
ER -