Contending Worldviews in the Clinical Encounter

Ashok Kumbamu, Gail Geller, Aaron Leppin, Cara Fernandez, Jon Tilburt, Barbara Koenig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations


Objective: In this article, the authors characterize the different ways patients and clinicians discuss complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) during routine cancer care. Methods: Over a period of two years, the authors audio-recorded clinical interactions between 37 medical oncology clinicians and a sample of 327 oncology patients at an academic cancer center in the Midwest United States. Recordings of conversations that included any discussion of CAM were transcribed and analyzed using a qualitative content analysis approach. Results: Out of 327 conversations, CAM was mentioned and/or discussed in only 31 encounters. Communication dynamics between clinician and patient involve several factors: the condition of the patient and his or her knowledge about and experience with CAM, the clinician's knowledge and values about CAM, perceived assumptions and stereotypes about CAM, and institutional response to the integration of CAM in cancer care. Conclusion: Addressing the difficult and sensitive topic of CAM in cancer care requires hearing patients in a manner meaningful to them. In that sense, CAM can serve as an important marker and test case in the march toward shared decision-making and patient-centered communication generally.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)996-1002
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
Issue number9-10
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018


  • clinical deliberations
  • complementary and alternative medicine
  • oncology
  • patient-physician communication
  • qualitative content analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Complementary and alternative medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Contending Worldviews in the Clinical Encounter'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this