Consensus Guidelines for Delineation of Clinical Target Volumes for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Intact Cervical Cancer: An Update

Emma C. Fields, Walter R. Bosch, Kevin V. Albuquerque, Rohini Bhatia, Junzo Chino, Brandon Dyer, Beth Erickson, Denise Fabian, David Gaffney, Scott Glaser, Kathy Han, Lara Hathout, I. Chow Hsu, Naresh Jegadeesh, Jenna Kahn, Elizabeth Kidd, Ann Klopp, Eric Leung, Lilie Lin, Michelle LudwigTianjun Ma, Loren Mell, Jyoti Mayadev, Ivy Petersen, Lorraine Portelance, Dominique Rash, Neil Taunk, Akila Viswanathan, Aaron Wolfson, Catheryn Yashar, Anamaria Yeung, Emi Yoshida, Christine M. Fisher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Accurate target delineation is essential when using intensity modulated radiation therapy for intact cervical cancer. In 2011, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group published a consensus guideline using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The current project expands on the previous atlas by including computed tomography (CT)-based contours, contours with MRI and positron emission tomography (PET) registrations, the addition of common and complex scenarios, and incorporating information on simulation and treatment planning techniques. Methods and Materials: Twenty-eight experts in gynecologic radiation oncology contoured 3 cases, first on a noncontrast CT simulation scan and then with registered diagnostic scans. The cases included (1) International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) IIIC1 with a bulky tumor and vaginal metastasis, (2) FIGO IIB with calcified uterine fibromas, and (3) FIGO IIIC2 with large lymph nodes. The contours on all 6 data sets (3 CT simulations without diagnostic images and 3 with registered images) were analyzed for consistency of delineation using an expectation-maximization algorithm for simultaneous truth and performance level estimation with kappa statistics as a measure of agreement. The contours were reviewed, discussed, and edited in a group meeting prior to finalizing. Results: Contours showed considerable agreement among experts in each of the cases, with kappa statistics from 0.67 to 0.72. For each case, diagnostic PET ± MRI was associated with an increase in volume. The largest increase was the clinical target volume (CTV) primary for case 2, with a 20% increase in volume and a 54% increase in simultaneous truth and performance level estimation volume, which may be due to variance in registration priorities. For the third case, 92.9% increased their CTVs based on the addition of the diagnostic PET scan. The main areas of variance were in determining the superior extent of CTV coverage, coverage of the mesorectum, and simulation and planning protocols. Conclusions: This study shows the value and the challenges of using coregistered diagnostic imaging, with an average increase in volumes when incorporating MRI and PET.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)171-179
Number of pages9
JournalPractical Radiation Oncology
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2025

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Consensus Guidelines for Delineation of Clinical Target Volumes for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Intact Cervical Cancer: An Update'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this