Complications and surgical revision for failed disc arthroplasty

John P. Kostuik

doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.021

Complications and surgical revision for failed disc arthroplasty

John P. Kostuik

School of Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This review will outline the indications and options for revision of failed disc arthroplasty. Such indications may include implant loosening, malposition, displacement, early wear, and infection. Each indication will likely require different preoperative planning, testing, and strategies.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	S289-S291
Journal	Spine Journal
Volume	4
Issue number	6 SUPPL.
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.021
State	Published - 2004

Keywords

Complications
Failed disc arthroplasty
Revision surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Surgery
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Clinical Neurology

Access to Document

10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.021

Cite this

@article{62bdaa9376224cc1b68d567c3f48b80c,

title = "Complications and surgical revision for failed disc arthroplasty",

abstract = "This review will outline the indications and options for revision of failed disc arthroplasty. Such indications may include implant loosening, malposition, displacement, early wear, and infection. Each indication will likely require different preoperative planning, testing, and strategies.",

keywords = "Complications, Failed disc arthroplasty, Revision surgery",

author = "Kostuik, {John P.}",

year = "2004",

doi = "10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.021",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "4",

pages = "S289--S291",

journal = "Spine Journal",

issn = "1529-9430",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

number = "6 SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Complications and surgical revision for failed disc arthroplasty

AU - Kostuik, John P.

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - This review will outline the indications and options for revision of failed disc arthroplasty. Such indications may include implant loosening, malposition, displacement, early wear, and infection. Each indication will likely require different preoperative planning, testing, and strategies.

AB - This review will outline the indications and options for revision of failed disc arthroplasty. Such indications may include implant loosening, malposition, displacement, early wear, and infection. Each indication will likely require different preoperative planning, testing, and strategies.

KW - Complications

KW - Failed disc arthroplasty

KW - Revision surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=8644259224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=8644259224&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.021

DO - 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.021

M3 - Article

C2 - 15541678

AN - SCOPUS:8644259224

SN - 1529-9430

VL - 4

SP - S289-S291

JO - Spine Journal

JF - Spine Journal

IS - 6 SUPPL.

ER -

Complications and surgical revision for failed disc arthroplasty

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this