Comparison of urographic and cholegraphic contrast enhanced CT liver scanning

Thomas F. Stephenson, Alex Chang, Kishan Pandya, Fernando Ona

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations


Six consecutive patients referred for CT scanning because of suspected hepatic metastases were scanned without contrast enhancement, with intravenous urographic contrast enhancement and 24 hr later with intravenous cholegraphic contrast enhancement. Unenhanced and intravenous urographic contrast enhanced scans were complementary in detecting hepatic metastases. Intravenous Cholegrafin was not effective as a contrast agent in detecting hepatic metastases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)257-262
Number of pages6
JournalComputerized Radiology
Issue number5
StatePublished - 1982
Externally publishedYes


  • CT liver scanningTechnique
  • Cholegraphic
  • Contrast agents
  • Urographic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging


Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of urographic and cholegraphic contrast enhanced CT liver scanning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this