Abstract
We compared 3 rapid assays for Clostridium difficile with a cell culture cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCNA). Of 600 stool samples, 46 were positive for toxigenic C difficile. Both rapid common antigen assays were highly sensitive (91.3%-100%) and, therefore, were appropriate screening tests. The rapid toxin assay had poor sensitivity (61%) but excellent specificity (99.3%). Testing stools for glutamate dehydrogenase (step 1) and those positive with a rapid toxin assay (step 2) would correctly classify 81% of submitted specimens within 2 hours, including during periods of limited staffing (evenings, nights, and weekends). CCNA could then be used as a third step to test rapid toxin-negative samples, thereby providing a final result for the remaining 19% of samples by 48 to 72 hours. The use of rapid assays as outlined could enhance timely diagnosis of C difficile.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 107-109 |
Number of pages | 3 |
Journal | American journal of clinical pathology |
Volume | 133 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 2010 |
Keywords
- Clostridium difficile
- Clostridium infections
- Cytotoxins
- Isolation and purification
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine