TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of the sampling characteristics of two vacuum surface samplers for the collection of dust mite allergen
AU - Lewis, Roger D.
AU - Breysse, Patrick N.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by a grant from the Center for Indoor Air Research, Linthicum, MD. and through support from the National Institute of Environmental Health Center at Johns Hopkins School of Public Health. Carpet materials and processing were supported by Alan Luedtke, PhD. and Kirk Hendricks, E.I. Dupont de Nemours Company, Dalton, GA. Immunoassays were performed by Robert Hamilton, PhD., Jack Wisenauer, and the excellent staff of the Johns Hopluns University Asthma and Allergy Center’s Dermatology, Al- lergy, and Clinical Immunology (DACI) Reference Laboratory. House dust used in this research was supplied by Berg-mmans’s Company, Arlington, VA.
PY - 1998/7
Y1 - 1998/7
N2 - Hand-held vacuum cleaners are commonly adapted for collection of allergens in settled dust; however, the collection efficiencies for most of these devices have not been investigated. We evaluated and compared the collection characteristics of two vacuum surface samplers: the ReadiVac (6735), a hand-held vacuum cleaner with a cloth filter bonnet; and the high volume surface sampler (HVS3), a modified upright vacuum cleaner equipped with a cyclone for collecting small particles and a means for adjusting the air flow in the sampler. The efficiency and precision of the two vacuum samplers were evaluated by vacuum sampling 30 matched-pair carpet samples doped with house dust containing dust mite allergen. The HVS3 recovered twice as much bulk dust and four times as much allergen as the ReadiVac, although the intake velocities of the two samplers were practically equivalent. The correlation of bulk dust recovery with allergen recovery by the ReadiVac was r = 0.54 compared with the HVS3’s of r = 0.90. These findings suggest that the ReadiVac sampler collection efficiency appears to have a significant particle size bias, which has important implications for the normalization of exposure results using the mass of bulk dust collected as the denominator. New reporting conventions for allergen exposure should be evaluated, and more efficient hand-held allergen collectors are needed.
AB - Hand-held vacuum cleaners are commonly adapted for collection of allergens in settled dust; however, the collection efficiencies for most of these devices have not been investigated. We evaluated and compared the collection characteristics of two vacuum surface samplers: the ReadiVac (6735), a hand-held vacuum cleaner with a cloth filter bonnet; and the high volume surface sampler (HVS3), a modified upright vacuum cleaner equipped with a cyclone for collecting small particles and a means for adjusting the air flow in the sampler. The efficiency and precision of the two vacuum samplers were evaluated by vacuum sampling 30 matched-pair carpet samples doped with house dust containing dust mite allergen. The HVS3 recovered twice as much bulk dust and four times as much allergen as the ReadiVac, although the intake velocities of the two samplers were practically equivalent. The correlation of bulk dust recovery with allergen recovery by the ReadiVac was r = 0.54 compared with the HVS3’s of r = 0.90. These findings suggest that the ReadiVac sampler collection efficiency appears to have a significant particle size bias, which has important implications for the normalization of exposure results using the mass of bulk dust collected as the denominator. New reporting conventions for allergen exposure should be evaluated, and more efficient hand-held allergen collectors are needed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031849942&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031849942&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/1047322X.1998.10390102
DO - 10.1080/1047322X.1998.10390102
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0031849942
SN - 1047-322X
VL - 13
SP - 536
EP - 541
JO - Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
JF - Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
IS - 7
ER -