Comparison of revision rates following endoscopically versus nonendoscopically placed ventricular shunt catheters: Commentary

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

@article{10f062ce024f4d60b076769d0702d82c,

title = "Comparison of revision rates following endoscopically versus nonendoscopically placed ventricular shunt catheters: Commentary",

author = "Cohen, {Alan R.}",

year = "2003",

month = may,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/S0090-3019(03)00092-2",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "59",

pages = "379--380",

journal = "Surgical neurology",

issn = "0090-3019",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of revision rates following endoscopically versus nonendoscopically placed ventricular shunt catheters

T2 - Commentary

AU - Cohen, Alan R.

PY - 2003/5/1

Y1 - 2003/5/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038585099&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038585099&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0090-3019(03)00092-2

DO - 10.1016/S0090-3019(03)00092-2

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:0038585099

SN - 0090-3019

VL - 59

SP - 379

EP - 380

JO - Surgical neurology

JF - Surgical neurology

IS - 5

ER -