Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of pneumatic retinopexy and scleral buckle for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To compare pneumatic retinopexy (PR) and scleral buckle for the repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 90 patients undergoing surgery for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, with 46 patients undergoing PR compared with 44 patients undergoing scleral buckle procedure (SBP). RESULTS: Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. Single surgery reattachment rate was 95.5% with SBP and 67% with PR (P = .00057). Final reattachment rate was 100% with SBP and 97.8% with PR. A final visual acuity (VA) of 20/40 or better occurred in 89% of patients with SBP and 72% of patients with PR (P = .04). PR and SBP had a similar mean VA if the primary procedures were successful, whereas those patients with unsuccessful PR had lower mean final acuities. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that SBP has a significantly higher rate of single surgery reattachment than PR, along with improved final VA. Initial success of PR may be an important predictor of final visual outcome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)887-893
Number of pages7
JournalOphthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging Retina
Volume48
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2017
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Ophthalmology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of pneumatic retinopexy and scleral buckle for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this