Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To compare pneumatic retinopexy (PR) and scleral buckle for the repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 90 patients undergoing surgery for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, with 46 patients undergoing PR compared with 44 patients undergoing scleral buckle procedure (SBP). RESULTS: Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. Single surgery reattachment rate was 95.5% with SBP and 67% with PR (P = .00057). Final reattachment rate was 100% with SBP and 97.8% with PR. A final visual acuity (VA) of 20/40 or better occurred in 89% of patients with SBP and 72% of patients with PR (P = .04). PR and SBP had a similar mean VA if the primary procedures were successful, whereas those patients with unsuccessful PR had lower mean final acuities. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that SBP has a significantly higher rate of single surgery reattachment than PR, along with improved final VA. Initial success of PR may be an important predictor of final visual outcome.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 887-893 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging Retina |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Nov 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surgery
- Ophthalmology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of pneumatic retinopexy and scleral buckle for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS