Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparing Similar and Dissimilar Competing Responses for Tic Management

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Competing-response training is an important component of Habit-Reversal Therapy. Competing responses are recommended to be incompatible with tics. However, research on the efficacy of non-incompatible (“dissimilar”) competing responses is scant. We conducted two experiments with individuals with tics who had at least one established incompatible (“similar”) competing response and completed Habit-Reversal Therapy previously. In Experiment 1, we compared similar and dissimilar competing responses in terms of tics reduction and interference with ongoing activities. In Experiment 2, we assessed the maintained effectiveness of dissimilar competing responses over multiple exposures, preference among competing response types, and the effects of similar and dissimilar competing responses on non-targeted tics. Across both experiments, we observed similar tic reduction and disruption of ongoing activity when participants used either competing response type. Engagement was generally greater in dissimilar competing responses. We discuss potential implications for clinicians and areas of future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere2068
JournalBehavioral Interventions
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2025

Keywords

  • CBIT
  • competing response
  • dissimilar competing response
  • habit reversal therapy
  • tics
  • Tourette

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing Similar and Dissimilar Competing Responses for Tic Management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this