Comparing Safety and Efficacy of “Third-Generation” Antiepileptic Drugs: Long-Term Extension and Post-marketing Treatment

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations


Four “third-generation” antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were approved for adjunctive treatment of refractory focal onset seizures during the past 10 years. Long-term efficacy and safety of the drugs were demonstrated in large extension studies and in reports of subgroups of patients not studied in pivotal trials. Reviewing extension study and post-marketing outcome series for the four newer AEDs—lacosamide, perampanel, eslicarbazepine acetate and brivaracetam—can guide clinicians in treating and monitoring patients. AED extension studies evaluate treatment retention, drug tolerability, and drug safety during individualized treatment with flexible dosing and thus provide information not available in rigid pivotal trials. Patient retention in the studies ranged from 75 to 80% at 1 year and from 36 to 68% at 2-year treatment intervals. Safety findings were generally similar to those of pivotal trials, with no major safety risks identified and with several specific adverse drug effects, such as hyponatremia, reported. The third-generation AEDs, some through new mechanisms and others with improved tolerability compared to related AEDs, provide new options in efficacy and tolerability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)959-974
Number of pages16
JournalCNS Drugs
Issue number11
StatePublished - Nov 1 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Pharmacology (medical)


Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing Safety and Efficacy of “Third-Generation” Antiepileptic Drugs: Long-Term Extension and Post-marketing Treatment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this