Comparative Merits of Available Mortality Data Sources for Clinical Research

Evan T. Sholle, Marcos A. Davila, Kristin Kostka, Sajjad Abedian, Marika Cusick, Spencer Krichevsky, Jyotishman Pathak, Thomas R. Campion

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Obtaining reliable data on patient mortality is a critical challenge facing observational researchers seeking to conduct studies using real-world data. As these analyses are conducted more broadly using newly-available sources of real-world evidence, missing data can serve as a rate-limiting factor. We conducted a comparison of mortality data sources from different stakeholder perspectives - academic medical center (AMC) informatics service providers, AMC research coordinators, industry analytics professionals, and academics - to understand the strengths and limitations of differing mortality data sources: locally generated data from sites conducting research, data provided by governmental sources, and commercially available data sets. Researchers seeking to conduct observational studies using extant data should consider these factors in sourcing outcomes data for their populations of interest.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)634-640
Number of pages7
JournalAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium
Volume2023
StatePublished - 2023
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative Merits of Available Mortality Data Sources for Clinical Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this