Community testing practices for autism within the autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network

Ashley Robinson Williams, Esther Amoakohene, Matthew J. Maenner, Walter Zahorodny, Monica DiRienzo, Andrea Grzybowski, Jennifer Hall-Lande, Elise T. Pas, Amanda V. Bakian, Maya Lopez, Mary Patrick, Josephine Shenouda, Kelly A. Shaw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: No data exist at the population level on what tests are used to aid in the diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder in community practice. Objectives: To describe autism spectrum disorder testing practices to inform autism spectrum disorder identification efforts. Methods: Data are from the Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, a multi-site surveillance system reporting prevalence estimates and characteristics of 8-year-old children with autism spectrum disorder. Percentages of children with autism spectrum disorder who received any autism spectrum disorder test or a ‘gold standard’ test were calculated by site, sex, race, median household income, and intellectual ability status. Risk ratios were calculated to compare group differences. Results: Of 5058 8-year-old children with autism spectrum disorder across 11 sites, 3236 (64.0%) had a record of any autism spectrum disorder test and 2136 (42.2%) had a ‘gold standard’ ADOS or ADI-R test. Overall, 115 children (2.3%) had both the ADOS and ADI-R in their records. Differences persisted across race, median household income, and intellectual ability status. Asian/Pacific Islander children had the highest percent receiving any ASD test (71.8%; other groups range: 57.4–66.0%) and White children had the highest percent receiving ‘gold standard’ tests (46.4%; other groups range: 35.6–43.2%). Children in low-income neighbourhoods had a lower percent of any test (62.5%) and ‘gold standard’ tests (39.4%) compared to medium (70.2% and 47.5%, respectively) and high (69.6% and 46.8%, respectively) income neighbourhoods. Children with intellectual disability had a lower percent of any ASD test (81.7%) and ‘gold standard’ tests (52.6%) compared to children without intellectual disability (84.0% and 57.6%, respectively). Conclusions: Autism spectrum disorder testing practices vary widely by site and differ by race and presence of co-occurring intellectual disability, suggesting opportunities to standardise and/or improve autism spectrum disorder identification practices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)426-431
Number of pages6
JournalPaediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
Volume38
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2024

Keywords

  • ADI-R
  • ADOS
  • autism spectrum disorder
  • diagnosis
  • gold standard
  • public health surveillance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Community testing practices for autism within the autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this