TY - JOUR
T1 - Community health workers use malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) safely and accurately
T2 - Results of a longitudinal study in Zambia
AU - Counihan, Helen
AU - Harvey, Steven A.
AU - Sekeseke-Chinyama, Masela
AU - Hamainza, Busiku
AU - Banda, Rose
AU - Malambo, Thindo
AU - Masaninga, Freddie
AU - Bell, David
PY - 2012/7
Y1 - 2012/7
N2 - Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) could radically improve febrile illness management in remote and low-resource populations. However, reliance upon community health workers (CHWs) remains controversial because of concerns about blood safety and appropriate use of artemisinin combination therapy. This study assessed CHW ability to use RDTs safely and accurately up to 12 months post-training. We trained 65 Zambian CHWs, and then provided RDTs, job-aids, and other necessary supplies for village use. Observers assessed CHW performance at 3, 6, and 12 months post-training. Critical steps performed correctly increased from 87.5% at 3 months to 100% subsequently. However, a few CHWs incorrectly read faint positive or invalid results as negative. Although most indicators improved or remained stable over time, interpretation of faint positives fell to 76.7% correct at 12 months. We conclude that appropriately trained and supervised CHWs can use RDTs safely and accurately in community practice for up to 12 months post-training.
AB - Malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) could radically improve febrile illness management in remote and low-resource populations. However, reliance upon community health workers (CHWs) remains controversial because of concerns about blood safety and appropriate use of artemisinin combination therapy. This study assessed CHW ability to use RDTs safely and accurately up to 12 months post-training. We trained 65 Zambian CHWs, and then provided RDTs, job-aids, and other necessary supplies for village use. Observers assessed CHW performance at 3, 6, and 12 months post-training. Critical steps performed correctly increased from 87.5% at 3 months to 100% subsequently. However, a few CHWs incorrectly read faint positive or invalid results as negative. Although most indicators improved or remained stable over time, interpretation of faint positives fell to 76.7% correct at 12 months. We conclude that appropriately trained and supervised CHWs can use RDTs safely and accurately in community practice for up to 12 months post-training.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863771597&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863771597&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0800
DO - 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0800
M3 - Article
C2 - 22764292
AN - SCOPUS:84863771597
SN - 0002-9637
VL - 87
SP - 57
EP - 63
JO - American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
JF - American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
IS - 1
ER -