Clinician's commentary: Atypia in urinary tract cytology specimens

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

At the 18th International Congress of Cytology in Paris in 2013, the “Paris Group” created standardized reporting system/criteria for urine cytopathology. This reporting system provided evidence-based criteria for all the urine cytopathologic diagnosis in aims to avoid atypia being used a “waste basket.” The addition of standard classification system greatly helps minimizing atypia diagnosis; however, clinicians, specifically, urologist, are still left without a clear set of guidelines for how to approach atypia. Prospective collaborate work with cytopathologists and urologist can help solve the dreaded atypia cytology pathological report and provide a framework and guidelines on management, providing better care to our patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)184-185
Number of pages2
JournalDiagnostic cytopathology
Volume50
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2022

Keywords

  • bladder cancer
  • urinary tract
  • urine
  • urology
  • urothelial carcinoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Histology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinician's commentary: Atypia in urinary tract cytology specimens'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this