TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical tracking of cell transfer and cell transplantation
T2 - Tu
AU - Bulte, Jeff W.M.
AU - Daldrup-Link, Heike E.
N1 - Funding Information:
J.W.M.B. is supported by the National Institutes of Health (grants R01 EB023647, R01 DK106972, R56 NS098520, P41 EB024495), the ALS Association (grant ALSA-16-IIP-252), the Maryland Stem Cell Research Fund (MSCRFE-0040), and the National Multiple Sclerosis Society (grant RG-4994-A3). H.E.D.L. is supported by the National Institutes of Health (grants R01 HD081123A, R01 AR054458, R21CA190196, and U54CA199075) and the Ben and Catherine Ivy Foundation.
Publisher Copyright:
© RSNA, 2018.
PY - 2018/12
Y1 - 2018/12
N2 - Cell therapy has provided unprecedented opportunities for tissue repair and cancer therapy. Imaging tools for in vivo tracking of therapeutic cells have entered the clinic to evaluate therapeutic cell delivery and retention in patients. Thus far, clinical cell tracking studies have been a mere proof of principle of the feasibility of cell detection. This review centers around the main clinical queries associated with cell therapy: Have cells been delivered correctly at the targeted site of injection? Are cells still alive, and, if so, how many? Are cells being rejected by the host, and, if so, how severe is the immune response? For stem cell therapeutics, have cells differentiated into downstream cell lineages? Is there cell proliferation including tumor formation? At present, clinical cell tracking trials have only provided information on immediate cell delivery and short-term cell retention. The next big question is if these cell tracking tools can improve the clinical management of the patients and, if so, by how much, for how many, and for whom; in addition, it must be determined whether tracking therapeutic cells in every patient is needed. To become clinically relevant, it must now be demonstrated how cell tracking techniques can inform patient treatment and affect clinical outcomes.
AB - Cell therapy has provided unprecedented opportunities for tissue repair and cancer therapy. Imaging tools for in vivo tracking of therapeutic cells have entered the clinic to evaluate therapeutic cell delivery and retention in patients. Thus far, clinical cell tracking studies have been a mere proof of principle of the feasibility of cell detection. This review centers around the main clinical queries associated with cell therapy: Have cells been delivered correctly at the targeted site of injection? Are cells still alive, and, if so, how many? Are cells being rejected by the host, and, if so, how severe is the immune response? For stem cell therapeutics, have cells differentiated into downstream cell lineages? Is there cell proliferation including tumor formation? At present, clinical cell tracking trials have only provided information on immediate cell delivery and short-term cell retention. The next big question is if these cell tracking tools can improve the clinical management of the patients and, if so, by how much, for how many, and for whom; in addition, it must be determined whether tracking therapeutic cells in every patient is needed. To become clinically relevant, it must now be demonstrated how cell tracking techniques can inform patient treatment and affect clinical outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056723912&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056723912&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1148/radiol.2018180449
DO - 10.1148/radiol.2018180449
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30299232
AN - SCOPUS:85056723912
SN - 0033-8419
VL - 289
SP - 604
EP - 615
JO - RADIOLOGY
JF - RADIOLOGY
IS - 3
ER -