TY - JOUR
T1 - Chemoresistance to cancer treatment
T2 - Benzo-α-pyrene as friend or foe?
AU - Dzobo, Kevin
AU - Hassen, Naseeha
AU - Senthebane, Dimakatso Alice
AU - Thomford, Nicholas Ekow
AU - Rowe, Arielle
AU - Shipanga, Hendrina
AU - Wonkam, Ambroise
AU - Iqbal Parker, M.
AU - Mowla, Shaheen
AU - Dandara, Collet
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments: We would like to acknowledge the University of Cape Town, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), National Research Foundation, and the Allan Gray Orbis Foundation for funding this research. The funders had no role in the conduct of the research or the preparation of the manuscript.
Funding Information:
We would like to acknowledge the University of Cape Town, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), National Research Foundation, and the Allan Gray Orbis Foundation for funding this research. The funders had no role in the conduct of the research or the preparation of the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 by the authors.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Background: Environmental pollution such as exposure to pro-carcinogens including benzo-α-pyrene is becoming a major problem globally. Moreover, the effects of benzo-α-pyrene (BaP) on drug pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and drug resistance warrant further investigation, especially in cancer outpatient chemotherapy where exposure to environmental pollutants might occur. Method: We report here on the effects of benzo-α-pyrene on esophageal cancer cells in vitro, alone, or in combination with chemotherapeutic drugs cisplatin, 5-flurouracil, or paclitaxel. As the study endpoints, we employed expression of proteins involved in cell proliferation, drug metabolism, apoptosis, cell cycle analysis, colony formation, migration, and signaling cascades in the WHCO1 esophageal cancer cell line after 24 h of treatment. Results: Benzo-α-pyrene had no significant effect on WHCO1 cancer cell proliferation but reversed the effect of chemotherapeutic drugs by reducing drug-induced cell death and apoptosis by 30–40% compared to drug-treated cells. The three drugs significantly reduced WHCO1 cell migration by 40–50% compared to control and BaP-treated cells. Combined exposure to drugs was associated with significantly increased apoptosis and reduced colony formation. Evaluation of survival signaling cascades showed that although the MEK-ERK and Akt pathways were activated in the presence of drugs, BaP was a stronger activator of the MEK-ERK and Akt pathways than the drugs. Conclusion: The present study suggest that BaP can reverse the effects of drugs on cancer cells via the activation of survival signaling pathways and upregulation of anti-apoptotic proteins such as Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL. Our data show that BaP contribute to the development of chemoresistant cancer cells.
AB - Background: Environmental pollution such as exposure to pro-carcinogens including benzo-α-pyrene is becoming a major problem globally. Moreover, the effects of benzo-α-pyrene (BaP) on drug pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and drug resistance warrant further investigation, especially in cancer outpatient chemotherapy where exposure to environmental pollutants might occur. Method: We report here on the effects of benzo-α-pyrene on esophageal cancer cells in vitro, alone, or in combination with chemotherapeutic drugs cisplatin, 5-flurouracil, or paclitaxel. As the study endpoints, we employed expression of proteins involved in cell proliferation, drug metabolism, apoptosis, cell cycle analysis, colony formation, migration, and signaling cascades in the WHCO1 esophageal cancer cell line after 24 h of treatment. Results: Benzo-α-pyrene had no significant effect on WHCO1 cancer cell proliferation but reversed the effect of chemotherapeutic drugs by reducing drug-induced cell death and apoptosis by 30–40% compared to drug-treated cells. The three drugs significantly reduced WHCO1 cell migration by 40–50% compared to control and BaP-treated cells. Combined exposure to drugs was associated with significantly increased apoptosis and reduced colony formation. Evaluation of survival signaling cascades showed that although the MEK-ERK and Akt pathways were activated in the presence of drugs, BaP was a stronger activator of the MEK-ERK and Akt pathways than the drugs. Conclusion: The present study suggest that BaP can reverse the effects of drugs on cancer cells via the activation of survival signaling pathways and upregulation of anti-apoptotic proteins such as Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL. Our data show that BaP contribute to the development of chemoresistant cancer cells.
KW - 5-fluorouracil
KW - Apoptosis
KW - Benzo-α-pyrene
KW - Chemoresistance
KW - Cisplatin
KW - Drug metabolizing enzymes
KW - Environmental pollution
KW - Esophageal cancer
KW - Paclitaxel
KW - Procarcinogen
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045626837&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045626837&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/molecules23040930
DO - 10.3390/molecules23040930
M3 - Article
C2 - 29673198
AN - SCOPUS:85045626837
SN - 1420-3049
VL - 23
JO - Molecules
JF - Molecules
IS - 4
M1 - 930
ER -