TY - JOUR
T1 - Characterizing community health workers on research teams
T2 - Results from the centers for population health and health disparities
AU - Hohl, Sarah D.
AU - Thompson, Beti
AU - Krok-Schoen, Jessica L.
AU - Weier, Rory C.
AU - Martin, Molly
AU - Bone, Lee
AU - McCarthy, William J.
AU - Noel, Sabrina E.
AU - Garcia, Beverly
AU - Calderón, Nancy E.
AU - Paskett, Electra D.
PY - 2016/4
Y1 - 2016/4
N2 - Objectives. To quantify the characteristics of community health workers (CHWs) involved in community intervention research and, in particular, to characterize their job titles, roles, and responsibilities; recruitment and compensation; and training and supervision. Methods.We developed and administered a structured questionnaire consisting of 25 closed-and open-ended questions to staff on National Institutes of Health-funded Centers for Population Health and Health Disparities projects between March and April 2014. We report frequency distributions for CHW roles, sought-after skills, education requirements, benefits and incentives offered, and supervision and training activities. Results. A total of 54 individuals worked as CHWs across the 18 research projects and held a diverse range of job titles. The CHWs commonly collaborated on research project implementation, provided education and support to study participants, and collected data.Training was offered across projects to bolsterCHWcapacity to assist in intervention and research activities. Conclusions. Our experience suggests national benefit in supporting greater efforts to recruit, retain, and support the work of CHWs in community-engagement research.
AB - Objectives. To quantify the characteristics of community health workers (CHWs) involved in community intervention research and, in particular, to characterize their job titles, roles, and responsibilities; recruitment and compensation; and training and supervision. Methods.We developed and administered a structured questionnaire consisting of 25 closed-and open-ended questions to staff on National Institutes of Health-funded Centers for Population Health and Health Disparities projects between March and April 2014. We report frequency distributions for CHW roles, sought-after skills, education requirements, benefits and incentives offered, and supervision and training activities. Results. A total of 54 individuals worked as CHWs across the 18 research projects and held a diverse range of job titles. The CHWs commonly collaborated on research project implementation, provided education and support to study participants, and collected data.Training was offered across projects to bolsterCHWcapacity to assist in intervention and research activities. Conclusions. Our experience suggests national benefit in supporting greater efforts to recruit, retain, and support the work of CHWs in community-engagement research.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961644840&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961644840&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302980
DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302980
M3 - Article
C2 - 26794157
AN - SCOPUS:84961644840
SN - 0090-0036
VL - 106
SP - 664
EP - 670
JO - American journal of public health
JF - American journal of public health
IS - 4
ER -