TY - JOUR
T1 - Chapter 3
T2 - Choosing the important outcomes for a systematic review of a medical test
AU - Segal, Jodi B.
PY - 2012/6
Y1 - 2012/6
N2 - In this chapter of the Evidence-based Practice Centers Methods Guide for Medical Tests, we describe how the decision to use a medical test generates a broad range of outcomes and that each of these outcomes should be considered for inclusion in a systematic review. Awareness of these varied outcomes affects how a decision maker balances the benefits and risks of the test; therefore, a systematic review should present the evidence on these diverse outcomes. The key outcome categories include clinical management outcomes and direct health effects; emotional, social, cognitive, and behavioral responses to testing; legal and ethical outcomes, and costs. We describe the challenges of incorporating these outcomes in a systematic review, suggest a framework for generating potential outcomes for inclusion, and describe the role of stakeholders in choosing the outcomes for study. Finally, we give examples of systematic reviews that either included a range of outcomes or that might have done so. The following are the key messages in this chapter: • Consider both the outcomes that are relevant to the process of testing and those that are relevant to the results of the test. • Consider inclusion of outcomes in all five domains: clinical management effects, direct test effects; emotional, social, cognitive and behavioral effects; legal and ethical effects, and costs. • Consider to which group the outcomes of testing are most relevant. • Given resource limitations, prioritize which outcomes to include. This decision depends on the needs of the stakeholder(s), who should be assisted in prioritizing the outcomes for inclusion.
AB - In this chapter of the Evidence-based Practice Centers Methods Guide for Medical Tests, we describe how the decision to use a medical test generates a broad range of outcomes and that each of these outcomes should be considered for inclusion in a systematic review. Awareness of these varied outcomes affects how a decision maker balances the benefits and risks of the test; therefore, a systematic review should present the evidence on these diverse outcomes. The key outcome categories include clinical management outcomes and direct health effects; emotional, social, cognitive, and behavioral responses to testing; legal and ethical outcomes, and costs. We describe the challenges of incorporating these outcomes in a systematic review, suggest a framework for generating potential outcomes for inclusion, and describe the role of stakeholders in choosing the outcomes for study. Finally, we give examples of systematic reviews that either included a range of outcomes or that might have done so. The following are the key messages in this chapter: • Consider both the outcomes that are relevant to the process of testing and those that are relevant to the results of the test. • Consider inclusion of outcomes in all five domains: clinical management effects, direct test effects; emotional, social, cognitive and behavioral effects; legal and ethical effects, and costs. • Consider to which group the outcomes of testing are most relevant. • Given resource limitations, prioritize which outcomes to include. This decision depends on the needs of the stakeholder(s), who should be assisted in prioritizing the outcomes for inclusion.
KW - diagnostic tests
KW - outcomes
KW - systematic review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862668339&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862668339&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11606-011-1802-x
DO - 10.1007/s11606-011-1802-x
M3 - Review article
C2 - 22648671
AN - SCOPUS:84862668339
SN - 0884-8734
VL - 27
SP - S20-S27
JO - Journal of general internal medicine
JF - Journal of general internal medicine
IS - SUPPL.1
ER -