TY - JOUR
T1 - Challenges associated with follow-up care after implementation of an HPV screen-and-treat program with ablative therapy for cervical cancer prevention
AU - the Proyecto Precancer Study Group
AU - Morse, Rachel M.
AU - Brown, Joanna
AU - Ríos López, E. Jennifer
AU - Prieto, Bryn A.
AU - Kohler-Smith, Anna
AU - Gonzales Díaz, Karina
AU - Figueredo Escudero, Magaly
AU - Lenin del Cuadro, Daniel
AU - Vásquez del Aguila, Giannina
AU - Daza Grandez, Henrry
AU - Meza‑Sánchez, Graciela
AU - Tracy, J. Kathleen
AU - Gravitt, Patti E.
AU - Paz‑Soldan, Valerie A.
AU - Carhuaza, Iris
AU - Carrillo Jara, Lita E.
AU - Carmen del Caruhapoma, María
AU - Del Carpio-Morgan, Meda
AU - Garcia Satalay, Esther Y.
AU - Gilman, Sarah D.
AU - Jerónimo, José
AU - Jorges, Alcedo
AU - Jurczuk, Magdalena
AU - Kosek, Margaret
AU - Ladrón de Guevarra, Gabriela
AU - Lopez Liñán, Renso
AU - Matos Orbegozo, Andrea
AU - Marín, Jaime
AU - Noble, Helen E.
AU - Palacios, Victor A.
AU - Ríos Reátegui, Reyles
AU - Rivas, Patricia
AU - Román, Karina
AU - Rositch, Anne F.
AU - Santos-Ortiz, Carlos
AU - Silva Delgado, Hermann F.
AU - Soto, Sandra
AU - Tangoa, Nolberto
AU - Vásquez Vásquez, Javier
AU - Zevallos, Karen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Background: Cervical cancer is a preventable cancer; however, decreasing its prevalence requires early detection and treatment strategies that reduce rates of loss to follow-up. This study explores factors associated with loss to follow-up among HPV-positive women after implementation of a new HPV-based screen-and-treat approach for cervical cancer prevention in Iquitos, Peru. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with “obstetras” (i.e., midwives) (n = 15) working in cervical cancer prevention and women (n = 24) who were recorded as lost to follow-up after positive HPV results. We used the Health Care Access Barriers Model to guide analyses. We utilized manifest content analysis to describe barriers to follow-up according to the obstetras and thematic analysis to report themes from the women’s perspectives. We also report the steps and time taken to contact women. Results: We found an incomplete and fragmented patient monitoring system. This incomplete system, in conjunction with challenges in contacting some of the women, led to structural barriers for the obstetras when attempting to deliver positive results. Women in this study expressed a desire to receive treatment, however, faced cognitive barriers including a lack of understanding about HPV results and treatment procedures, fear or anxiety about HPV or treatment, and confusion about the follow-up process. Women also reported having important work matters as a barrier and reported frequently using natural medicine. Reported financial barriers were minimal. Conclusion: This study highlights the barriers to follow-up after implementation of a primary-level HPV-based screen-and-treat approach. While some barriers that have previously been associated with loss to follow-up were not as prominently observed in this study (e.g., financial), we emphasize the need for screen-and-treat programs to focus on strategies that can address incomplete registry systems, structural challenges in results delivery, cognitive barriers in understanding results and treatment, and work-related barriers.
AB - Background: Cervical cancer is a preventable cancer; however, decreasing its prevalence requires early detection and treatment strategies that reduce rates of loss to follow-up. This study explores factors associated with loss to follow-up among HPV-positive women after implementation of a new HPV-based screen-and-treat approach for cervical cancer prevention in Iquitos, Peru. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with “obstetras” (i.e., midwives) (n = 15) working in cervical cancer prevention and women (n = 24) who were recorded as lost to follow-up after positive HPV results. We used the Health Care Access Barriers Model to guide analyses. We utilized manifest content analysis to describe barriers to follow-up according to the obstetras and thematic analysis to report themes from the women’s perspectives. We also report the steps and time taken to contact women. Results: We found an incomplete and fragmented patient monitoring system. This incomplete system, in conjunction with challenges in contacting some of the women, led to structural barriers for the obstetras when attempting to deliver positive results. Women in this study expressed a desire to receive treatment, however, faced cognitive barriers including a lack of understanding about HPV results and treatment procedures, fear or anxiety about HPV or treatment, and confusion about the follow-up process. Women also reported having important work matters as a barrier and reported frequently using natural medicine. Reported financial barriers were minimal. Conclusion: This study highlights the barriers to follow-up after implementation of a primary-level HPV-based screen-and-treat approach. While some barriers that have previously been associated with loss to follow-up were not as prominently observed in this study (e.g., financial), we emphasize the need for screen-and-treat programs to focus on strategies that can address incomplete registry systems, structural challenges in results delivery, cognitive barriers in understanding results and treatment, and work-related barriers.
KW - Cervical cancer
KW - HPV screening
KW - Lost to follow-up
KW - Post-implementation
KW - Screen-and-treat
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85200535853&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85200535853&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12889-024-19436-3
DO - 10.1186/s12889-024-19436-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 39107728
AN - SCOPUS:85200535853
SN - 1471-2458
VL - 24
JO - BMC public health
JF - BMC public health
IS - 1
M1 - 2121
ER -