TY - JOUR
T1 - Ceftobiprole for Treatment of Complicated Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
AU - Holland, Thomas L.
AU - Cosgrove, Sara E.
AU - Doernberg, Sarah B.
AU - Jenkins, Timothy C.
AU - Turner, Nicholas A.
AU - Boucher, Helen W.
AU - Pavlov, Oleksander
AU - Titov, Ivan
AU - Kosulnykov, Serhii
AU - Atanasov, Boyko
AU - Poromanski, Ivan
AU - Makhviladze, Manana
AU - Anderzhanova, Anastasia
AU - Stryjewski, Martin E.
AU - Assadi Gehr, Maziar
AU - Engelhardt, Marc
AU - Hamed, Kamal
AU - Ionescu, Daniel
AU - Jones, Mark
AU - Saulay, Mikael
AU - Smart, Jennifer
AU - Seifert, Harald
AU - Fowler, Vance G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background Ceftobiprole is a cephalosporin that may be effective for treating complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Methods In this phase 3, double-blind, double-dummy, noninferiority trial, adults with complicated S. aureus bacteremia were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive ceftobiprole at a dose of 500 mg intravenously every 6 hours for 8 days and every 8 hours thereafter, or daptomycin at a dose of 6 to 10 mg per kilogram of body weight intravenously every 24 hours plus optional aztreonam (at the discretion of the trial-site investigators). The primary outcome, overall treatment success 70 days after randomization (defined as survival, bacteremia clearance, symptom improvement, no new S. aureus bacteremia-related complications, and no receipt of other potentially effective antibiotics), with a noninferiority margin of 15%, was adjudicated by a data review committee whose members were unaware of the trial-group assignments. Safety was also assessed. Results Of 390 patients who underwent randomization, 387 (189 in the ceftobiprole group and 198 in the daptomycin group) had confirmed S. aureus bacteremia and received ceftobiprole or daptomycin (modified intention-to-treat population). A total of 132 of 189 patients (69.8%) in the ceftobiprole group and 136 of 198 patients (68.7%) in the daptomycin group had overall treatment success (adjusted difference, 2.0 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI],-7.1 to 11.1). Findings appeared to be consistent between the ceftobiprole and daptomycin groups in key subgroups and with respect to secondary outcomes, including mortality (9.0% and 9.1%, respectively; 95% CI,-6.2 to 5.2) and the percentage of patients with microbiologic eradication (82.0% and 77.3%; 95% CI,-2.9 to 13.0). Adverse events were reported in 121 of 191 patients (63.4%) who received ceftobiprole and 117 of 198 patients (59.1%) who received daptomycin; serious adverse events were reported in 36 patients (18.8%) and 45 patients (22.7%), respectively. Gastrointestinal adverse events (primarily mild nausea) were more frequent with ceftobiprole. Conclusions Ceftobiprole was noninferior to daptomycin with respect to overall treatment success in patients with complicated S. aureus bacteremia. (Funded by Basilea Pharmaceutica International and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; ERADICATE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03138733.)
AB - Background Ceftobiprole is a cephalosporin that may be effective for treating complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Methods In this phase 3, double-blind, double-dummy, noninferiority trial, adults with complicated S. aureus bacteremia were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive ceftobiprole at a dose of 500 mg intravenously every 6 hours for 8 days and every 8 hours thereafter, or daptomycin at a dose of 6 to 10 mg per kilogram of body weight intravenously every 24 hours plus optional aztreonam (at the discretion of the trial-site investigators). The primary outcome, overall treatment success 70 days after randomization (defined as survival, bacteremia clearance, symptom improvement, no new S. aureus bacteremia-related complications, and no receipt of other potentially effective antibiotics), with a noninferiority margin of 15%, was adjudicated by a data review committee whose members were unaware of the trial-group assignments. Safety was also assessed. Results Of 390 patients who underwent randomization, 387 (189 in the ceftobiprole group and 198 in the daptomycin group) had confirmed S. aureus bacteremia and received ceftobiprole or daptomycin (modified intention-to-treat population). A total of 132 of 189 patients (69.8%) in the ceftobiprole group and 136 of 198 patients (68.7%) in the daptomycin group had overall treatment success (adjusted difference, 2.0 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI],-7.1 to 11.1). Findings appeared to be consistent between the ceftobiprole and daptomycin groups in key subgroups and with respect to secondary outcomes, including mortality (9.0% and 9.1%, respectively; 95% CI,-6.2 to 5.2) and the percentage of patients with microbiologic eradication (82.0% and 77.3%; 95% CI,-2.9 to 13.0). Adverse events were reported in 121 of 191 patients (63.4%) who received ceftobiprole and 117 of 198 patients (59.1%) who received daptomycin; serious adverse events were reported in 36 patients (18.8%) and 45 patients (22.7%), respectively. Gastrointestinal adverse events (primarily mild nausea) were more frequent with ceftobiprole. Conclusions Ceftobiprole was noninferior to daptomycin with respect to overall treatment success in patients with complicated S. aureus bacteremia. (Funded by Basilea Pharmaceutica International and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; ERADICATE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03138733.)
KW - Bacterial Infections
KW - Infectious Disease
KW - Infectious Disease General
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177071024&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85177071024&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa2300220
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa2300220
M3 - Article
C2 - 37754204
AN - SCOPUS:85177071024
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 389
SP - 1390
EP - 1401
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 15
ER -