Caspofungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia

Thomas J. Walsh, Hedy Teppler, Gerald R. Donowitz, Johan A. Maertens, Lindsey R. Baden, Anna Dmoszynska, Oliver A. Cornely, Michael R. Bourque, Robert J. Lupinacci, Carole A. Sable, Ben E. DePauw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

759 Scopus citations


BACKGROUND: Patients with persistent fever and neutropenia often receive empirical therapy with conventional or liposomal amphotericin B for the prevention and early treatment of invasive fungal infections. Caspofungin, a member of the new echinocandin class of compounds, may be an effective alternative that is better tolerated than amphotericin B. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, multinational trial, we assessed the efficacy and safety of caspofungin as compared with liposomal amphotericin B as empirical antifungal therapy. At study entry, patients were stratified according to risk and according to whether they had previously received antifungal prophylaxis. A successful outcome was defined as the fulfillment of all components of a five-part composite end point. RESULTS: Efficacy was evaluated in 1095 patients (556 receiving caspofungin and 539 receiving liposomal amphotericin B). After adjustment for strata, the overall success rates were 33.9 percent for caspofungin and 33.7 percent for liposomal amphotericin B (95.2 percent confidence interval for the difference, -5.6 to 6.0 percent), fulfilling statistical criteria for the noninferiority of caspofungin. Among patients with baseline fungal infections, a higher proportion of those treated with caspofungin had a successful outcome (51.9 percent vs. 25.9 percent, P=0.04). The proportion of patients who survived at least seven days after therapy was greater in the caspofungin group (92.6 percent vs. 89.2 percent, P=0.05). Premature study discontinuation occurred less often in the caspofungin group than in the amphotericin B group (10.3 percent vs. 14.5 percent, P=0.03). The rates of breakthrough fungal infections and resolution of fever during neutropenia were similar in the two groups. Fewer patients who received caspofungin sustained a nephrotoxic effect (2.6 percent vs. 11.5 percent, P<0.001), an infusion-related event (35.1 percent vs. 51.6 percent, P<0.001), or a drug-related adverse event or discontinued therapy because of drug-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Caspofungin is as effective as and generally better tolerated than liposomal amphotericin B when given as empirical antifungal therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1391-1402+1474
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Issue number14
StatePublished - Sep 30 2004
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Caspofungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this