TY - JOUR
T1 - Case study
T2 - A Midclerkship crisis-lessons learned from advising a medical student with career indecision
AU - Levine, Rachel B.
AU - Cayea, Danelle
AU - Shochet, Robert B.
AU - Wright, Scott M.
PY - 2010/4
Y1 - 2010/4
N2 - Advising medical students is a challenging task. Faculty who serve as advisors for students require specific skills and knowledge to do their jobs effectively. Career choice is one of the many complex issues about which medical students often seek assistance from a faculty advisor. The authors present a case of a third-year medical student with career indecision, with a focus on the various factors that may be influencing her thinking about career choice. Key advising principles are provided as a framework for the discussion of the case and include reflection, self-disclosure, active listening, support and advocacy, confidentiality, and problem solving. These principles were developed as part of the Advising Case Conference series of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Colleges Advisory Program. Emergent themes from the case included a student's evolving professional identity, a student's distress and burnout, lifestyle considerations, and advisor bias and self-awareness. The authors propose reflective questions to enhance meaningful discussions between the advisor and student and assist in problem solving. Many of these questions, together with the key advising principles, are generalizable to a variety of advising scenarios between advisors and learners at all levels of training.
AB - Advising medical students is a challenging task. Faculty who serve as advisors for students require specific skills and knowledge to do their jobs effectively. Career choice is one of the many complex issues about which medical students often seek assistance from a faculty advisor. The authors present a case of a third-year medical student with career indecision, with a focus on the various factors that may be influencing her thinking about career choice. Key advising principles are provided as a framework for the discussion of the case and include reflection, self-disclosure, active listening, support and advocacy, confidentiality, and problem solving. These principles were developed as part of the Advising Case Conference series of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Colleges Advisory Program. Emergent themes from the case included a student's evolving professional identity, a student's distress and burnout, lifestyle considerations, and advisor bias and self-awareness. The authors propose reflective questions to enhance meaningful discussions between the advisor and student and assist in problem solving. Many of these questions, together with the key advising principles, are generalizable to a variety of advising scenarios between advisors and learners at all levels of training.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951683573&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951683573&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d299b7
DO - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d299b7
M3 - Article
C2 - 20354382
AN - SCOPUS:77951683573
SN - 1040-2446
VL - 85
SP - 654
EP - 659
JO - Academic Medicine
JF - Academic Medicine
IS - 4
ER -