TY - JOUR
T1 - Case-area targeted preventive interventions to interrupt cholera transmission
T2 - Current implementation practices and lessons learned
AU - Sikder, Mustafa
AU - Altare, Chiara
AU - Doocy, Shannon
AU - Trowbridge, Daniella
AU - Kaur, Gurpreet
AU - Kaushal, Natasha
AU - Lyles, Emily
AU - Lantagne, Daniele
AU - Azman, Andrew S.
AU - Spiegel, Paul
N1 - Funding Information:
Funds for this research were provided by the Bureau for Humanitarian Assistance, US Agency for Development (https://www.usaid.gov/) Grant number 720FDA19GR00205 (PS, CA, SD, AA). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Sikder et al.
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Background Cholera is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in low-resource and humanitarian set-tings. It is transmitted by fecal-oral route, and the infection risk is higher to those living in and near cholera cases. Rapid identification of cholera cases and implementation of measures to prevent subsequent transmission around cases may be an efficient strategy to reduce the size and scale of cholera outbreaks. Methodology/Principle findings We investigated implementation of cholera case-area targeted interventions (CATIs) using systematic reviews and case studies. We identified 11 peer-reviewed and eight grey litera-ture articles documenting CATIs and completed 30 key informant interviews in case studies in Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, Yemen, and Zimbabwe. We documented 15 outbreaks in 12 countries where CATIs were used. The team composition and the interventions varied, with water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions implemented more commonly than those of health. Alert systems triggering interventions were diverse ranging from suspected cholera cases to culture confirmed cases. Selection of high-risk households around the case household was inconsistent and ranged from only one case to approximately 100 sur-rounding households with different methods of selecting them. Coordination among actors and integration between sectors were consistently reported as challenging. Delays in sharing case information impeded rapid implementation of this approach, while evaluation of the effectiveness of interventions varied. Conclusions/Significance CATIs appear effective in reducing cholera outbreaks, but there is limited and context specific evidence of their effectiveness in reducing the incidence of cholera cases and lack of guidance for their consistent implementation. We propose to 1) use uniform cholera case definitions considering a local capacity to trigger alert; 2) evaluate the effectiveness of indi-vidual or sets of interventions to interrupt cholera, and establish a set of evidence-based interventions; 3) establish criteria to select high-risk households; and 4) improve coordination and data sharing amongst actors and facilitate integration among sectors to strengthen CATI approaches in cholera outbreaks.
AB - Background Cholera is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in low-resource and humanitarian set-tings. It is transmitted by fecal-oral route, and the infection risk is higher to those living in and near cholera cases. Rapid identification of cholera cases and implementation of measures to prevent subsequent transmission around cases may be an efficient strategy to reduce the size and scale of cholera outbreaks. Methodology/Principle findings We investigated implementation of cholera case-area targeted interventions (CATIs) using systematic reviews and case studies. We identified 11 peer-reviewed and eight grey litera-ture articles documenting CATIs and completed 30 key informant interviews in case studies in Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, Yemen, and Zimbabwe. We documented 15 outbreaks in 12 countries where CATIs were used. The team composition and the interventions varied, with water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions implemented more commonly than those of health. Alert systems triggering interventions were diverse ranging from suspected cholera cases to culture confirmed cases. Selection of high-risk households around the case household was inconsistent and ranged from only one case to approximately 100 sur-rounding households with different methods of selecting them. Coordination among actors and integration between sectors were consistently reported as challenging. Delays in sharing case information impeded rapid implementation of this approach, while evaluation of the effectiveness of interventions varied. Conclusions/Significance CATIs appear effective in reducing cholera outbreaks, but there is limited and context specific evidence of their effectiveness in reducing the incidence of cholera cases and lack of guidance for their consistent implementation. We propose to 1) use uniform cholera case definitions considering a local capacity to trigger alert; 2) evaluate the effectiveness of indi-vidual or sets of interventions to interrupt cholera, and establish a set of evidence-based interventions; 3) establish criteria to select high-risk households; and 4) improve coordination and data sharing amongst actors and facilitate integration among sectors to strengthen CATI approaches in cholera outbreaks.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122208102&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85122208102&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010042
DO - 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010042
M3 - Article
C2 - 34919551
AN - SCOPUS:85122208102
SN - 1935-2727
VL - 15
JO - PLoS neglected tropical diseases
JF - PLoS neglected tropical diseases
IS - 12
M1 - e0010042
ER -