TY - JOUR
T1 - Caregiver involvement in applied behavior-analytic research
T2 - A scoping review and discussion
AU - Becraft, Jessica L.
AU - Hardesty, Samantha L.
AU - Goldman, Kissel J.
AU - Shawler, Lesley A.
AU - Edelstein, Matthew L.
AU - Orchowitz, Phillip
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior (SEAB).
PY - 2024/1/1
Y1 - 2024/1/1
N2 - We conducted a scoping review to characterize the role of caregiver involvement in behavior-analytic research. We reviewed eight behavioral-learning journals from 2011–2022 for works that included children or caregivers as participants and characterized caregiver involvement as passive (implications for caregivers, input, social validity) and active (implementation, caregiver behavior, training, caregiver-collected data). The review identified 228 studies, and almost all (96.1%; n = 219) involved caregivers in some capacity; 94.3% (n = 215) had passive involvement (26.8% had only passive involvement; n = 61), 69.3% (n = 158) had active involvement (1.8% had only active involvement; n = 4), and 3.9% (n = 9) had neither passive nor active involvement. Involvement generally increased over publication years. The most common types of involvement were implications for caregivers, implementation, and input; caregiver-collected data were rare. We propose considerations when engaging caregivers in research and suggest new avenues of inquiry related to caregivers' treatment objectives and social validity, treatment implementers, and caregiver-collected data.
AB - We conducted a scoping review to characterize the role of caregiver involvement in behavior-analytic research. We reviewed eight behavioral-learning journals from 2011–2022 for works that included children or caregivers as participants and characterized caregiver involvement as passive (implications for caregivers, input, social validity) and active (implementation, caregiver behavior, training, caregiver-collected data). The review identified 228 studies, and almost all (96.1%; n = 219) involved caregivers in some capacity; 94.3% (n = 215) had passive involvement (26.8% had only passive involvement; n = 61), 69.3% (n = 158) had active involvement (1.8% had only active involvement; n = 4), and 3.9% (n = 9) had neither passive nor active involvement. Involvement generally increased over publication years. The most common types of involvement were implications for caregivers, implementation, and input; caregiver-collected data were rare. We propose considerations when engaging caregivers in research and suggest new avenues of inquiry related to caregivers' treatment objectives and social validity, treatment implementers, and caregiver-collected data.
KW - applied behavior analysis
KW - caregivers
KW - clinical endpoints
KW - parents
KW - scoping review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85176284598&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85176284598&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jaba.1035
DO - 10.1002/jaba.1035
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 37937407
AN - SCOPUS:85176284598
SN - 0021-8855
VL - 57
SP - 55
EP - 70
JO - Journal of applied behavior analysis
JF - Journal of applied behavior analysis
IS - 1
ER -