C4A deficiency due to a 2 bp insertion is increased patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Kathleen E. Sullivan, Nahmah A. Kim, Daniel Goldman, Michelle A. Petri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective. The association of C4A deficiency with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is well documented. In Caucasian populations, the most common cause of C4A deficiency is a large gene deletion in linkage disequilibrium with a conserved MHC haplotype. Because of this linkage disequilibrium, it has been difficult to determine which of the genes constitutes the disease susceptibility allele. Evidence from non-caucasoid populations has supported a role for C4A deficiency in SLE. We investigated whether a specific genetic cause of C4A deficiency, not associated with A1, B8, DR3, is found with increased frequency in SLE compared to controls. Methods. Polymerase chain reaction was used to identify carriers of a 2 base pair (bp) insertion in exon 29. In total, 188 patients with SLE from the Johns Hopkins lupus cohort and 222 controls were genotyped. Results. The 2 bp insertion was found more frequently in patients with SLE compared to controls and was more common in Caucasian than in African American SLE patients. There were no clinical differences between patients that carried the mutation and those that did not. Conclusion. The association of this C4A null allele with SLE supports a role for C4A deficiency independent of other MHC associations in the etiopathogenesis of SLE.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2144-2147
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Rheumatology
Volume26
Issue number10
StatePublished - 1999

Keywords

  • C4A
  • Complement
  • Immune complex
  • MHC
  • Systemic lupus erythematosus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rheumatology
  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'C4A deficiency due to a 2 bp insertion is increased patients with systemic lupus erythematosus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this