Breast cancer risk in Ashkenazi BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: Effects of reproductive history

Patricia Hartge, Nilanjan Chatterjee, Sholom Wacholder, Lawrence C. Brody, Margaret A. Tucker, Jeffery P. Struewing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background. Younger age at first birth and greater parity generally reduce the risk of developing breast cancer, but whether this reduced risk holds in women with a mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene is unknown. Methods. In a Washington DC community-based study conducted in 1996, we tested 5318 Ashkenazi Jews for three BRCA1/2 founder mutations and identified 120 mutation carriers. Applying an extension of the "kin-cohort" analysis, we compared the effects of reproduction on breast cancer risk in carriers and noncarriers. We also used a case-case analysis among 288 participants who had been diagnosed with breast cancer. Results. In noncarriers, the estimated relative risk (RR) of breast cancer rose 5% with each 5-year increment in age at first birth (RR = 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.97-1.15). By contrast, the estimated risk in mutation carriers fell with each 5-year increment tn age (RR = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.37-1.16). Among the 288 participants who were breast cancer survivors themselves, the comparison of carriers with noncarriers also showed no protection associated with early birth in the presence of a mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Conclusions. It is not yet clear whether the recognized breast cancer risk factors operate in the same way in women who carry a mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)255-261
Number of pages7
JournalEpidemiology
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2 2002
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • BRCA1/2 mutation
  • Breast cancer
  • Epidemiology
  • Reproduction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Breast cancer risk in Ashkenazi BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: Effects of reproductive history'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this