Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Brain-age defines a structural signature of outcomes after vagus nerve stimulation in children

  • Timur H. Latypov
  • , Hrishikesh Suresh
  • , Flavia Venetucci Gouveia
  • , Karim Mithani
  • , Alexandre Berger
  • , Simeon M. Wong
  • , Sebastian C. Coleman
  • , Shelly Weiss
  • , Lauren Sham
  • , Vann Chau
  • , Aristides Hadjinicolaou
  • , Philippe Major
  • , Alexander G. Weil
  • , Jignesh Tailor
  • , Taylor J. Abel
  • , Madison Remick
  • , Emefa Akwayena
  • , Dewi Schrader
  • , Robert J. Bollo
  • , Matthew D. Smyth
  • Diane Aum, Sean Lew, Shelly Wang, Toba Niazi, Jeffrey S. Raskin, Elysa Widjaja, Gregory W. Albert, Howard L. Weiner, Nisha Gadgil, Melissa A. LoPresti, Aria Fallah, Elizabeth N. Kerr, Puneet Jain, Eisha Christian, Elizabeth Donner, James T. Rutka, George M. Ibrahim

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Outcomes following vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) are difficult to predict prior to surgery in pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). We investigated whether structural brain differences among children may explain variability in VNS response. Methods: A pediatric-specific brain-age model was developed using structural MRI from 2623 healthy individuals aged 1.9 to 90 years, capturing nonlinear neurodevelopmental trajectories. Model accuracy was evaluated using cross-validation and independent validation in a pediatric cohort. The model was then applied to a multicenter cohort of 126 children with DRE treated with VNS. Results: The brain-age model demonstrated high accuracy (R2 = 0.93; mean absolute error = 3.5 years) and generalized well to an independent pediatric cohort (mean absolute error = 2.16 years). Applied to the VNS cohort, it revealed significantly elevated brain-age gaps (BrainAGEgap) compared to age- and sex-matched controls (t = 6.27, p < 0.0001), indicating cumulative structural divergence from age-referenced norms. BrainAGEgap correlated with baseline seizure burden and postoperative changes in seizure frequency. Lower pre-surgical BrainAGEgap predicted a significantly higher likelihood of becoming a clinical responder to VNS (p = 0.01). Local age within the cingulate cortex, thalamus, nucleus accumbens, and prefrontal cortex contributed disproportionately to BrainAGEgap differences, aligning with VNS-related circuitry. Conclusion: Developmental structural differences can be summarized using a robust, single-metric biomarker that reflects both disease burden and treatment responsiveness. BrainAGEgap may support individualized prognostic assessment and improve clinical decision-making in pediatric DRE undergoing neuromodulation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number103117
JournalBrain Stimulation
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2026
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Brain aging
  • Connectivos
  • Epilepsy
  • Machine learning
  • Neuroimaging
  • Pediatric
  • Vagus nerve stimulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Neuroscience
  • Biophysics
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Brain-age defines a structural signature of outcomes after vagus nerve stimulation in children'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this