TY - JOUR
T1 - Body mass index as a predictor of prostate cancer
T2 - Development versus detection on biopsy
AU - Freedland, Stephen J.
AU - Terris, Martha K.
AU - Platz, Elizabeth A.
AU - Presti, Joseph C.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Georgia Cancer Coalition (M.K.T.), the Department of Defense, Prostate Cancer Research Program, PC030666 (S.J.F.) and DAMD 17-03-1-0273 (E.A.P.), Fund for Research and Progress in Urology (E.A.P.), NIH Specialized Programs of Research Excellence, Career Development Award P50CA58236 (E.A.P.), and the American Foundation for Urological Disease/American Urological Association Education and Research Scholarship Award (S.J.F.).
PY - 2005/7
Y1 - 2005/7
N2 - Objectives. To determine whether obesity is biologically associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer development, especially aggressive disease and to explore whether a bias may exist in our ability to detect these cancers in obese patients. Methods. We evaluated the association of body mass index (BMI) with prostate cancer, biopsy Gleason sum, and amount of cancer using logistic and linear regression analyses adjusting for age at biopsy, race, prostate-specific antigen level, digital rectal examination findings, and prostate volume among 787 consecutive men undergoing prostate biopsy between 1998 and 2002 at an equal-access medical center. Results. Men with a higher BMI were younger (P <0.001), had lower prostate-specific antigen concentrations (P = 0.02), fewer abnormal digital rectal examination findings (P = 0.02), and larger prostate volumes (P <0.001). After adjusting for age, no overall association was found between BMI and the odds of being diagnosed with cancer (P trend = 0.89), although overweight and mild obesity were inversely associated with the diagnosis of cancer. After multivariable adjustment, a higher BMI was associated with an increased odds of being diagnosed with prostate cancer (P trend = 0.007). Among men diagnosed with cancer, and after multivariable adjustment, a higher BMI was associated with a similar percentage of biopsy tissue with cancer (P trend = 0.23), but with greater odds of a high Gleason sum (P trend = 0.004). Conclusions. After taking into account the clinical characteristics that influence the likelihood of finding an existent cancer, a higher BMI was positively associated with being diagnosed with prostate cancer. Also, among the men with cancer, a higher BMI increased the odds of high-grade disease. These findings suggest that obesity may be biologically associated with prostate cancer development and, in particular, with high-grade disease.
AB - Objectives. To determine whether obesity is biologically associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer development, especially aggressive disease and to explore whether a bias may exist in our ability to detect these cancers in obese patients. Methods. We evaluated the association of body mass index (BMI) with prostate cancer, biopsy Gleason sum, and amount of cancer using logistic and linear regression analyses adjusting for age at biopsy, race, prostate-specific antigen level, digital rectal examination findings, and prostate volume among 787 consecutive men undergoing prostate biopsy between 1998 and 2002 at an equal-access medical center. Results. Men with a higher BMI were younger (P <0.001), had lower prostate-specific antigen concentrations (P = 0.02), fewer abnormal digital rectal examination findings (P = 0.02), and larger prostate volumes (P <0.001). After adjusting for age, no overall association was found between BMI and the odds of being diagnosed with cancer (P trend = 0.89), although overweight and mild obesity were inversely associated with the diagnosis of cancer. After multivariable adjustment, a higher BMI was associated with an increased odds of being diagnosed with prostate cancer (P trend = 0.007). Among men diagnosed with cancer, and after multivariable adjustment, a higher BMI was associated with a similar percentage of biopsy tissue with cancer (P trend = 0.23), but with greater odds of a high Gleason sum (P trend = 0.004). Conclusions. After taking into account the clinical characteristics that influence the likelihood of finding an existent cancer, a higher BMI was positively associated with being diagnosed with prostate cancer. Also, among the men with cancer, a higher BMI increased the odds of high-grade disease. These findings suggest that obesity may be biologically associated with prostate cancer development and, in particular, with high-grade disease.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=22344442396&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=22344442396&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2005.01.060
DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2005.01.060
M3 - Article
C2 - 15992911
AN - SCOPUS:22344442396
SN - 0090-4295
VL - 66
SP - 108
EP - 113
JO - Urology
JF - Urology
IS - 1
ER -