TY - JOUR
T1 - Biology of Human Tumors Development and clinical validation of an in situ biopsy-based multimarker assay for risk stratification in prostate cancer
AU - Blume-Jensen, Peter
AU - Berman, David M.
AU - Rimm, David L.
AU - Shipitsin, Michail
AU - Putzi, Mathew
AU - Nifong, Thomas P.
AU - Small, Clayton
AU - Choudhury, Sibgat
AU - Capela, Teresa
AU - Coupal, Louis
AU - Ernst, Christina
AU - Hurley, Aeron
AU - Kaprelyants, Alex
AU - Chang, Hua
AU - Giladi, Eldar
AU - Nardone, Julie
AU - Dunyak, James
AU - Loda, Massimo
AU - Klein, Eric A.
AU - Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina
AU - Latour, Mathieu
AU - Epstein, Jonathan I.
AU - Kantoff, Philip
AU - Saad, Fred
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 American Association for Cancer Research.
PY - 2015/6/1
Y1 - 2015/6/1
N2 - Purpose: Prostate cancer aggressiveness and appropriate therapy are routinely determined following biopsy sampling. Current clinical and pathologic parameters are insufficient for accurate risk prediction leading primarily to overtreatment and also missed opportunities for curative therapy. Experimental Design: An 8-biomarker proteomic assay for intact tissue biopsies predictive of prostate pathology was defined in a study of 381 patient biopsies with matched prostatectomy specimens. A second blinded study of 276 cases validated this assay's ability to distinguish "favorable" versus "nonfavorable" pathology independently and relative to current risk classification systems National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN and D'Amico). Results: A favorable biomarker risk score of≤0.33, and a nonfavorable risk score of >0.80 (possible range between 0 and 1) were defined on "false-negative" and "false-positive" rates of 10% and 5%, respectively. At a risk score-0.33, predictive values for favorable pathology in very low-risk and low-risk NCCN and low-risk D'Amico groups were 95%, 81.5%, and 87.2%, respectively, higher than for these current risk classification groups themselves (80.3%, 63.8%, and 70.6%, respectively). The predictive value for nonfavorable pathology was 76.9% at biomarker risk scores >0.8 across all risk groups. Increased biomarker risk scores correlated with decreased frequency of favorable cases across all risk groups. The validation study met its two coprimary endpoints, separating favorable from nonfavorable pathology (AUC, 0.68; P < 0.0001; OR, 20.9) and GS-6 versus non-GS-6 pathology (AUC, 0.65; P < 0.0001; OR, 12.95). Conclusions: The 8-biomarker assay provided individualized, independent prognostic information relative to current risk stratification systems, and may improve the precision of clinical decision making following prostate biopsy.
AB - Purpose: Prostate cancer aggressiveness and appropriate therapy are routinely determined following biopsy sampling. Current clinical and pathologic parameters are insufficient for accurate risk prediction leading primarily to overtreatment and also missed opportunities for curative therapy. Experimental Design: An 8-biomarker proteomic assay for intact tissue biopsies predictive of prostate pathology was defined in a study of 381 patient biopsies with matched prostatectomy specimens. A second blinded study of 276 cases validated this assay's ability to distinguish "favorable" versus "nonfavorable" pathology independently and relative to current risk classification systems National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN and D'Amico). Results: A favorable biomarker risk score of≤0.33, and a nonfavorable risk score of >0.80 (possible range between 0 and 1) were defined on "false-negative" and "false-positive" rates of 10% and 5%, respectively. At a risk score-0.33, predictive values for favorable pathology in very low-risk and low-risk NCCN and low-risk D'Amico groups were 95%, 81.5%, and 87.2%, respectively, higher than for these current risk classification groups themselves (80.3%, 63.8%, and 70.6%, respectively). The predictive value for nonfavorable pathology was 76.9% at biomarker risk scores >0.8 across all risk groups. Increased biomarker risk scores correlated with decreased frequency of favorable cases across all risk groups. The validation study met its two coprimary endpoints, separating favorable from nonfavorable pathology (AUC, 0.68; P < 0.0001; OR, 20.9) and GS-6 versus non-GS-6 pathology (AUC, 0.65; P < 0.0001; OR, 12.95). Conclusions: The 8-biomarker assay provided individualized, independent prognostic information relative to current risk stratification systems, and may improve the precision of clinical decision making following prostate biopsy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941947994&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941947994&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2603
DO - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2603
M3 - Article
C2 - 25733599
AN - SCOPUS:84941947994
SN - 1078-0432
VL - 21
SP - 2591
EP - 2600
JO - Clinical Cancer Research
JF - Clinical Cancer Research
IS - 11
ER -