TY - JOUR
T1 - Beyond cost
T2 - Exploring fuel choices and the socio-cultural dynamics of liquefied petroleum gas stove adoption in Peru
AU - CHAP trial Investigators
AU - Williams, Kendra N.
AU - Kephart, Josiah L.
AU - Fandiño-Del-Rio, Magdalena
AU - Condori, Leonora
AU - Koehler, Kirsten
AU - Moulton, Lawrence H.
AU - Checkley, William
AU - Harvey, Steven A.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was financed by the Global Environmental and Occupational Health, Fogarty International Center, United States National Institutes of Health ( U01TW010107 ); the Clean Cooking Alliance of the United Nations Foundation ( UNF 16-810 ), and the Johns Hopkins Center for Global Health. KNW and JLK were supported by the NIH Fogarty International Center, NINDS, NIMH, NHBLI and NIEHS under NIH Research Training Grant # D43 TW009340 and the Johns Hopkins Center for Global Health. KNW was also supported by the NIH/NHLBI under Award Number T32HL007534. JLK was additionally supported by the Ruth L. Kirschstein Institutional National Research Service Award (5T32ES007141-33) funded by the NIH/NIEHS. MFDR was supported by the Global Environmental and Occupational Health (GEOHealth) Hub through the NIH Fogarty International Center (1U2RTW010114-01), and by the David Leslie Swift Fund of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Our Global Non-Communicable Disease Research and Training field centre in Puno, Peru, also received generous support from Mr. William and Bonnie Clarke III and the COPD Discovery Award from Johns Hopkins University. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of these organizations.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/8
Y1 - 2020/8
N2 - Reducing the burden of household air pollution requires that cleaner fuels such as liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) be used nearly exclusively. However, exclusive adoption has been challenging in low- and middle-income countries. Previous studies have found that economic, social, and cultural barriers often impede adoption. We conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with 22 participants in a research trial where LPG was provided for free in Puno, Peru. We aimed to determine whether social and cultural barriers to LPG use persisted when monetary costs to the households were removed, and what factors influenced exclusive adoption of LPG in a cost-free context. Facilitators of LPG use included: support from study staff, family support, time savings, previous experience with LPG, stove design, ability to use existing pots, smoke reductions, desire for cleanliness, removal of traditional stoves, and perceptions of luck. Barriers to LPG use included: fears of LPG, problems with LPG brands, delays in obtaining LPG refills, social pressure, perceived incompatibility of traditional dishes, perceived inability to use clay pots, separate kitchens for LPG and traditional stoves, designated pots for use on the traditional stove, and lack of heat. However, these barriers did not prevent participants from using LPG nearly exclusively. Results suggest that social and cultural barriers to exclusive LPG use can be overcome when LPG stoves and fuel are provided at no cost to users and supplemented with behavioral support. Governments should evaluate the economic feasibility and sustainability of LPG subsidization, considering the potential benefits of exclusive LPG use.
AB - Reducing the burden of household air pollution requires that cleaner fuels such as liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) be used nearly exclusively. However, exclusive adoption has been challenging in low- and middle-income countries. Previous studies have found that economic, social, and cultural barriers often impede adoption. We conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with 22 participants in a research trial where LPG was provided for free in Puno, Peru. We aimed to determine whether social and cultural barriers to LPG use persisted when monetary costs to the households were removed, and what factors influenced exclusive adoption of LPG in a cost-free context. Facilitators of LPG use included: support from study staff, family support, time savings, previous experience with LPG, stove design, ability to use existing pots, smoke reductions, desire for cleanliness, removal of traditional stoves, and perceptions of luck. Barriers to LPG use included: fears of LPG, problems with LPG brands, delays in obtaining LPG refills, social pressure, perceived incompatibility of traditional dishes, perceived inability to use clay pots, separate kitchens for LPG and traditional stoves, designated pots for use on the traditional stove, and lack of heat. However, these barriers did not prevent participants from using LPG nearly exclusively. Results suggest that social and cultural barriers to exclusive LPG use can be overcome when LPG stoves and fuel are provided at no cost to users and supplemented with behavioral support. Governments should evaluate the economic feasibility and sustainability of LPG subsidization, considering the potential benefits of exclusive LPG use.
KW - Behavior change
KW - Clean cookstoves
KW - Household air pollution
KW - Household energy
KW - Peru
KW - Qualitative research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085292808&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85085292808&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101591
DO - 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101591
M3 - Article
C2 - 32742936
AN - SCOPUS:85085292808
SN - 2214-6296
VL - 66
JO - Energy Research and Social Science
JF - Energy Research and Social Science
M1 - 101591
ER -