TY - JOUR
T1 - Balancing scientific and community interests in community-based participatory research
AU - Resnik, David B.
AU - Kennedy, Caitlin E.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported, in part, by the intramural program of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), National Institutes of Health (NIH). It does not represent the views of the NIEHS or NIH.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Community-based participatory research is an approach to studying human populations that emphasizes extensive partnerships between researchers and community members. While there are many advantages of this approach, it also faces a number of conceptual and practical challenges, one of which is managing the conflict that sometimes arises between promoting scientific and community interests. This essay explores the potential conflict between scientific and community interests in several different stages of community-based participatory research, including research design, data interpretation, and publication, and makes some suggestions for practice and policy. To manage potential conflicts between scientific and community interests, investigators and community partners should enter into written agreements at the beginning of the study. In some cases, it may be necessary for a third party, such as a review committee from a supporting institution, the community, or a funding agency, to help investigators and community partners resolve disagreements. It may also be useful, in some situations, to publish a dissenting opinion when investigators and community partners cannot agree on how to interpret findings resulting from a study. These strategies may help address some of the challenges of implementing community-based participatory research.
AB - Community-based participatory research is an approach to studying human populations that emphasizes extensive partnerships between researchers and community members. While there are many advantages of this approach, it also faces a number of conceptual and practical challenges, one of which is managing the conflict that sometimes arises between promoting scientific and community interests. This essay explores the potential conflict between scientific and community interests in several different stages of community-based participatory research, including research design, data interpretation, and publication, and makes some suggestions for practice and policy. To manage potential conflicts between scientific and community interests, investigators and community partners should enter into written agreements at the beginning of the study. In some cases, it may be necessary for a third party, such as a review committee from a supporting institution, the community, or a funding agency, to help investigators and community partners resolve disagreements. It may also be useful, in some situations, to publish a dissenting opinion when investigators and community partners cannot agree on how to interpret findings resulting from a study. These strategies may help address some of the challenges of implementing community-based participatory research.
KW - Community based participatory research
KW - Data interpretation
KW - Data sharing
KW - Ethics
KW - Objectivity
KW - Openness
KW - Publication
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954248042&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954248042&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/08989621.2010.493095
DO - 10.1080/08989621.2010.493095
M3 - Article
C2 - 20597018
AN - SCOPUS:77954248042
SN - 0898-9621
VL - 17
SP - 198
EP - 210
JO - Accountability in Research
JF - Accountability in Research
IS - 4
ER -