Baclofen pumps do not increase risk of complications following spinal fusion

Harms Study Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the complication risks associated with intrathecal baclofen (ITB) pumps in cerebral palsy (CP) patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) and to determine if timing of pump implantation before or during PSF impacts the risk of complications. Methods: A prospectively collected multicenter database was retrospectively reviewed to identify CP patients undergoing PSF from 2008 to 2023. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: those with an ITB pump (ITB cohort) and those without (non-ITB cohort). The ITB cohort was further categorized by placement of the pump prior to or during PSF. Cohorts were then compared in terms of postoperative complications, perioperative complications, and need for revision surgery. Results: Four hundred six patients (ITB n = 79 [53 prior to, 26 during PSF], non-ITB n = 326) were included in this analysis. At an average follow-up of 4.0 years (range 2–10 years), there were no significant differences between the ITB and non-ITB cohorts in the rate of perioperative complications (5.0% vs 6.5%, p = 0.80), revision surgeries (2.5% vs 4.6%, p = 0.54), or any complication type, regardless of whether pumps were placed prior to or during PSF, aside from longer surgical times in the latter group. Conclusion: Complication rates are similar for ITBs placed prior to and during PSF. Patients with spastic CP may safely be treated with ITB pumps without increased risks of complication or further reoperation/revision following PSF. Level of evidence: Level III.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)473-480
Number of pages8
JournalSpine deformity
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2024

Keywords

  • Baclofen
  • Cerebral palsy
  • Complications
  • Scoliosis
  • Spinal fusion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Baclofen pumps do not increase risk of complications following spinal fusion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this