TY - JOUR
T1 - Autoantibodies in post-treatment Lyme disease and association with clinical symptoms
AU - Keshtkarjahromi, Marzieh
AU - Rebman, Alison W.
AU - Antar, Annukka A.R.
AU - Manabe, Yukari C.
AU - Gutierrez-Alamillo, Laura
AU - Casciola-Rosen, Livia A.
AU - Aucott, John N.
AU - Miller, John B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RHEUMATOLOGY 2024.
PY - 2024/7
Y1 - 2024/7
N2 - Objective. Autoantibodies have been described in the post-infectious state, specifically after Lyme disease and COVID-19. We aimed to describe the prevalence and potential clinical utility of several commercially available autoantibodies after these infections. Methods. Euroimmun panels (myositis, scleroderma and ANA5) were assayed using sera from patients with Lyme disease with return to health (RTH) (n=70), post-treatment Lyme disease (n=58), COVID-19 RTH (n=47) and post-acute symptoms of COVID-19 (n=22). The post-Lyme questionnaire of symptoms (PLQS) was used to determine symptom burden after Lyme disease. Results. There was no statistically significant difference in autoantibody prevalence across the four groups (p=0.746). A total of 21 different antibodies were found in the Lyme cohorts and 8 different antibodies in the COVID-19 cohorts. The prevalence of scleroderma-associated antibodies was higher after Lyme disease than COVID-19 (12.5% vs. 2.9%, p=0.026). There was no statistically significant difference in symptom burden based on antibody status. Conclusion. Several autoantibodies were found after Borrelia burgdorferi and SARS-CoV2 infection, although the prevalence was similar in those with persistent symptoms and those who returned to health. While our data show no difference in autoantibody prevalence across the four post-infectious states, we do not imply that autoantibodies are irrelevant in this setting. Rather, this study highlights the need for novel antibody discovery in larger cohorts of well-defined patient populations.
AB - Objective. Autoantibodies have been described in the post-infectious state, specifically after Lyme disease and COVID-19. We aimed to describe the prevalence and potential clinical utility of several commercially available autoantibodies after these infections. Methods. Euroimmun panels (myositis, scleroderma and ANA5) were assayed using sera from patients with Lyme disease with return to health (RTH) (n=70), post-treatment Lyme disease (n=58), COVID-19 RTH (n=47) and post-acute symptoms of COVID-19 (n=22). The post-Lyme questionnaire of symptoms (PLQS) was used to determine symptom burden after Lyme disease. Results. There was no statistically significant difference in autoantibody prevalence across the four groups (p=0.746). A total of 21 different antibodies were found in the Lyme cohorts and 8 different antibodies in the COVID-19 cohorts. The prevalence of scleroderma-associated antibodies was higher after Lyme disease than COVID-19 (12.5% vs. 2.9%, p=0.026). There was no statistically significant difference in symptom burden based on antibody status. Conclusion. Several autoantibodies were found after Borrelia burgdorferi and SARS-CoV2 infection, although the prevalence was similar in those with persistent symptoms and those who returned to health. While our data show no difference in autoantibody prevalence across the four post-infectious states, we do not imply that autoantibodies are irrelevant in this setting. Rather, this study highlights the need for novel antibody discovery in larger cohorts of well-defined patient populations.
KW - Infection
KW - Lyme disease
KW - autoantibodies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85199158075&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85199158075&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/qcupkk
DO - 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/qcupkk
M3 - Article
C2 - 38607687
AN - SCOPUS:85199158075
SN - 0392-856X
VL - 42
SP - 1487
EP - 1490
JO - Clinical and experimental rheumatology
JF - Clinical and experimental rheumatology
IS - 7
ER -