TY - JOUR
T1 - Audience segmentation as a social-marketing tool in health promotion
T2 - Use of the risk perception attitude framework in HIV prevention in Malawi
AU - Rimal, Rajiv N.
AU - Brown, Jane
AU - Mkandawire, Glory
AU - Folda, Lisa
AU - Böse, Kirsten
AU - Creel, Alisha H.
PY - 2009/12/1
Y1 - 2009/12/1
N2 - Objectives. We sought to determine whether individuals' risk perceptions and efficacy beliefs could be used to meaningfully segment audiences to assist interventions that seek to change HIV-related behaviors. Methods. A household-level survey of individuals (N=968) was conducted in 4 districts in Malawi. On the basis of responses about perceptions of risk and beliefs about personal efficacy, we used cluster analysis to create 4 groups within the risk perception attitude framework: responsive (high risk, strong efficacy), avoidance (high risk, weak efficacy), proactive (low risk, strong efficacy), and indifference (low risk, weak efficacy). We ran analysis of covariance models (controlling for known predictors) to determine how membership in the risk perception attitude framework groups would affect knowledge about HIV, HIV-testing uptake, and condom use. Results. A significant association was found between membership in 1 or more of the 4 risk perception attitude framework groups and the 3 study variables of interest: knowledge about HIV (F 8, 956=20.77; P<.001), HIV testing uptake (F 8, 952=10.91; P<.001), and condom use (F8, 885=29.59; P<.001). Conclusions. The risk perception attitude framework can serve as a theoretically sound audience segmentation technique that can be used to determine whether messages should augment perceptions of risk, beliefs about personal efficacy, or both.
AB - Objectives. We sought to determine whether individuals' risk perceptions and efficacy beliefs could be used to meaningfully segment audiences to assist interventions that seek to change HIV-related behaviors. Methods. A household-level survey of individuals (N=968) was conducted in 4 districts in Malawi. On the basis of responses about perceptions of risk and beliefs about personal efficacy, we used cluster analysis to create 4 groups within the risk perception attitude framework: responsive (high risk, strong efficacy), avoidance (high risk, weak efficacy), proactive (low risk, strong efficacy), and indifference (low risk, weak efficacy). We ran analysis of covariance models (controlling for known predictors) to determine how membership in the risk perception attitude framework groups would affect knowledge about HIV, HIV-testing uptake, and condom use. Results. A significant association was found between membership in 1 or more of the 4 risk perception attitude framework groups and the 3 study variables of interest: knowledge about HIV (F 8, 956=20.77; P<.001), HIV testing uptake (F 8, 952=10.91; P<.001), and condom use (F8, 885=29.59; P<.001). Conclusions. The risk perception attitude framework can serve as a theoretically sound audience segmentation technique that can be used to determine whether messages should augment perceptions of risk, beliefs about personal efficacy, or both.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=72249113680&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=72249113680&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2008.155234
DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2008.155234
M3 - Article
C2 - 19833992
AN - SCOPUS:72249113680
SN - 0090-0036
VL - 99
SP - 2224
EP - 2229
JO - American journal of public health
JF - American journal of public health
IS - 12
ER -