Associations of Prior Head Injury with Olfaction in Older Adults: Results from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study

Andrea L.C. Schneider, Rebecca F. Gottesman, Thomas H. Mosley, Srishti Shrestha, Nicholas R. Rowan, A. Richey Sharrett, Honglei Chen, Vidyulata Kamath

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Importance: Traumatic brain injury has been associated with short-term olfactory dysfunction, but the association of number of prior head injuries and head injury severity with both subjective and objective long-term olfactory function is less clear. Objective: To investigate the associations of prior head injury, number of prior head injuries, and head injury severity with subjective and psychophysical (objective) olfactory function in older adults and to examine concordance between subjective and objective olfactory function among individuals with and without head injury. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study included 5951 participants who attended Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study visit 5 (2011 through 2013). Data analysis was performed between November 2021 and May 2022. Exposures: Head injury was defined by self-report and International Classification of Diseases codes. Main Outcomes and Measures: Self-reported subjective olfactory dysfunction was assessed by the question, "Do you suffer from smell loss or a significantly decreased sense of smell?" Objective olfactory performance was assessed using the 12-item Sniffin' Sticks odor identification test. Results: Overall, the 5951 participants were a mean (SD) age of 75.6 (5.2) years, 3501 (58.8%) were female, 1356 (22.8%) were of Black race, and 1666 (28.0%) had a history of head injury. Participants with prior head injury were more likely than individuals without prior head injury to report subjective olfactory dysfunction (24% vs 20%; difference, 4%; 95% CI, 1% to 6%) and have objective anosmia (15% vs 13%; difference, 2%; 95% CI, 0.1% to 4%) but had lower concordance between subjective and objective assessment (72% vs 77%; difference, -5%; 95% CI, -8% to -3%). In logistic regression models adjusted for sociodemographics and medical comorbidities including cognitive status, participants with a history of prior head injury, particularly individuals with 2 or more prior head injuries and more severe head injuries, were more likely to self-report subjective olfactory dysfunction and were more likely to be found to have objective anosmia compared with participants with no history of head injury. Conclusions and Relevance: Findings of this cohort study provide evidence supporting the association between head injury and olfactory dysfunction, particularly among individuals who experienced multiple prior head injuries and among individuals with more severe head injury. The findings also suggest that individuals with prior head injury were more likely to both under-self-report and over-self-report deficits compared with objective olfactory testing; therefore, it may be important to consider objective olfactory testing in this patient population..

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)840-848
Number of pages9
JournalJAMA Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Volume148
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Associations of Prior Head Injury with Olfaction in Older Adults: Results from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this