Association of pre–left ventricular assist device defibrillator shocks for ventricular arrhythmia with clinical outcomes after left ventricular assist device implantation

Daniel G. Wann, Andrew S. Baird, Norman C. Wang, Suresh R. Mulukutla, Floyd W. Thoma, Ahmet Sezer, Ann M. Canterbury, Amr F. Barakat, Michael W. Gardner, Jenna N. Skowronski, Konstantinos N. Aronis, Andrew H. Voigt, Sandeep K. Jain, Samir F. Saba, Aditya Bhonsale, N. A.Mark Estes, Mary E. Keebler, Gavin W. Hickey, Raveen R. Bazaz, Krishna Kancharla

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillation (ICD) shocks after left ventricular assist device therapy (LVAD) are associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Little is known about the association of pre-LVAD ICD shocks on post-LVAD clinical outcomes and whether LVAD therapy affects the prevalence of ICD shocks. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine whether pre-LVAD ICD shocks are associated with adverse clinical outcomes post-LVAD and to compare the prevalence of ICD shocks before and after LVAD therapy Methods: Patients 18 years or older with continuous-flow LVADs and ICDs were retrospectively identified within the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center system from 2006–2020. We analyzed the association between appropriate ICD shocks within 1 year pre-LVAD with a primary composite outcome of death, stroke, and pump thrombosis and secondary outcomes of post-LVAD ICD shocks and ICD shock hospitalizations. Results: Among 309 individuals, average age was 57 ± 12 years, 87% were male, 80% had ischemic cardiomyopathy, and 42% were bridge to transplantation. Seventy-one patients (23%) experienced pre-LVAD shocks, and 69 (22%) experienced post-LVAD shocks. The overall prevalence of shocks pre-LVAD and post-LVAD were not different. Pre-LVAD ICD shocks were not associated with the composite outcome. Pre-LVAD ICD shocks were found to predict post-LVAD shocks (hazard ratio [HR] 5.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.42–9.48; P <.0001) and hospitalizations related to ICD shocks from ventricular arrhythmia (HR 10.34; 95% CI 4.1–25.7; P <.0001). Conclusion: Pre-LVAD ICD shocks predicted post-LVAD ICD shocks and hospitalizations but were not associated with the composite outcome of death, pump thrombosis, or stroke at 1 year. The prevalence of appropriate ICD shocks was similar before and after LVAD implantation in the entire cohort.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)708-714
Number of pages7
JournalHeart Rhythm O2
Volume4
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Assist device
  • Defibrillation
  • Heart failure
  • Mechanical support
  • Ventricular tachycardia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Association of pre–left ventricular assist device defibrillator shocks for ventricular arrhythmia with clinical outcomes after left ventricular assist device implantation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this