TY - JOUR
T1 - ArtifactID
T2 - Identifying artifacts in low-field MRI of the brain using deep learning
AU - Manso Jimeno, Marina
AU - Ravi, Keerthi Sravan
AU - Jin, Zhezhen
AU - Oyekunle, Dotun
AU - Ogbole, Godwin
AU - Geethanath, Sairam
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - Low-field MR scanners are more accessible in resource-constrained settings where skilled personnel are scarce. Images acquired in such scenarios are prone to artifacts such as wrap-around and Gibbs ringing. Such artifacts negatively affect the diagnostic quality and may be confused with pathology or reduce the region of interest visibility. As a first step solution, ArtifactID identifies wrap-around and Gibbs ringing in low-field brain MRI. We utilized two datasets: 179 T1-weighted pathological brain images from a 0.36 T scanner and 581 publicly available T1-weighted brain images. Individual binary classification models were trained to identify through-plane wrap-around, in-plane wrap-around, and Gibbs ringing. Visual explanations obtained via the GradCAM method helped develop trust in the wrap-around model. The mean precision and recall metrics across the four implemented models were 97.6% and 92.83% respectively. Agreement analysis of the models and the radiologists' labels returned Cohen's kappa values of 0.768 ± 0.062, 1.00 ± 0.000, 0.89 ± 0.085, and 0.878 ± 0.103 for the through-plane wrap-around, in-plane wrap-around, and Gibbs ringing models, respectively.
AB - Low-field MR scanners are more accessible in resource-constrained settings where skilled personnel are scarce. Images acquired in such scenarios are prone to artifacts such as wrap-around and Gibbs ringing. Such artifacts negatively affect the diagnostic quality and may be confused with pathology or reduce the region of interest visibility. As a first step solution, ArtifactID identifies wrap-around and Gibbs ringing in low-field brain MRI. We utilized two datasets: 179 T1-weighted pathological brain images from a 0.36 T scanner and 581 publicly available T1-weighted brain images. Individual binary classification models were trained to identify through-plane wrap-around, in-plane wrap-around, and Gibbs ringing. Visual explanations obtained via the GradCAM method helped develop trust in the wrap-around model. The mean precision and recall metrics across the four implemented models were 97.6% and 92.83% respectively. Agreement analysis of the models and the radiologists' labels returned Cohen's kappa values of 0.768 ± 0.062, 1.00 ± 0.000, 0.89 ± 0.085, and 0.878 ± 0.103 for the through-plane wrap-around, in-plane wrap-around, and Gibbs ringing models, respectively.
KW - Automated quality assurance
KW - Explainable artificial intelligence
KW - Gibbs ringing
KW - Wrap-around
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126108724&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85126108724&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.mri.2022.02.002
DO - 10.1016/j.mri.2022.02.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 35176447
AN - SCOPUS:85126108724
SN - 0730-725X
VL - 89
SP - 42
EP - 48
JO - Magnetic Resonance Imaging
JF - Magnetic Resonance Imaging
ER -