Are multiplanar reconstructions necessary in routine body computed tomography practice? What is the published evidence?

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: During computed tomography interpretation, some anatomical regions are optimally displayed in planes other than axial. The purpose of this review was to define best interpretative practice, by demonstrating through literature review and case demonstration the computed tomography applications that should routinely include multiplanar viewing of the volume. Conclusions: Owing to multidetector-row computed tomography technology, multiplanar reconstructions not only have become realistic and reliable but also, in some clinical settings, have been shown to improve diagnostic accuracy and interpretation speed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)689-698
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of computer assisted tomography
Volume34
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Keywords

  • Computed tomography
  • Multiplanar reconstructions
  • Postprocessing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are multiplanar reconstructions necessary in routine body computed tomography practice? What is the published evidence?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this