TY - JOUR
T1 - Application of classification methods when group sizes are unequal by incorporation of prior probabilities to three common approaches
T2 - Application to simulations and mouse urinary chemosignals
AU - Dixon, Sarah J.
AU - Heinrich, Nina
AU - Holmboe, Maria
AU - Schaefer, Michele L.
AU - Reed, Randall R.
AU - Trevejo, Jose
AU - Brereton, Richard G.
N1 - Funding Information:
The experimental data collection in this work was sponsored by ARO Contract DAAD19-03-1-0215 . Opinions, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the United States Government. This paper has been approved for public release, distribution unlimited.
PY - 2009/12/15
Y1 - 2009/12/15
N2 - Four common classification methods are described, Euclidean Distance to Centroids (EDC), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA) and Support Vector Machines (SVM). In many applications of chemometrics e.g. in medicine and biology it is common for there to be unequal sample sizes in different groups. When class sizes are unequal the performance of some of these methods may be biased according to class size. This paper describes approaches for incorporating prior probabilities of class membership using Bayesian approaches to three of the methods LDA, QDA and SVM, either assuming equal probability or assuming that the relative sample sizes relate to the relative probabilities. EDC is used as a benchmark to determine model stabilities. The methods are illustrated by four simulated datasets of different structures and one real dataset consisting of the gas chromatographic profile of mouse urine comparing controls to those on a diet.
AB - Four common classification methods are described, Euclidean Distance to Centroids (EDC), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA) and Support Vector Machines (SVM). In many applications of chemometrics e.g. in medicine and biology it is common for there to be unequal sample sizes in different groups. When class sizes are unequal the performance of some of these methods may be biased according to class size. This paper describes approaches for incorporating prior probabilities of class membership using Bayesian approaches to three of the methods LDA, QDA and SVM, either assuming equal probability or assuming that the relative sample sizes relate to the relative probabilities. EDC is used as a benchmark to determine model stabilities. The methods are illustrated by four simulated datasets of different structures and one real dataset consisting of the gas chromatographic profile of mouse urine comparing controls to those on a diet.
KW - Bayesian methods
KW - Classification
KW - Linear Discriminant Analysis
KW - Quadratic Discriminant Analysis
KW - Support Vector Machines
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350425622&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350425622&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.chemolab.2009.07.016
DO - 10.1016/j.chemolab.2009.07.016
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:70350425622
SN - 0169-7439
VL - 99
SP - 111
EP - 120
JO - Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems
JF - Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems
IS - 2
ER -