TY - JOUR
T1 - Antibacterial envelope to prevent cardiac implantable device infection
AU - WRAP-IT Investigators
AU - Tarakji, Khaldoun G.
AU - Mittal, Suneet
AU - Kennergren, Charles
AU - Corey, Ralph
AU - Poole, Jeanne E.
AU - Schloss, Edward
AU - Gallastegui, Jose
AU - Pickett, Robert A.
AU - Evonich, Rudolph
AU - Philippon, François
AU - McComb, Janet M.
AU - Roark, Steven F.
AU - Sorrentino, Denise
AU - Sholevar, Darius
AU - Cronin, Edmond
AU - Berman, Brett
AU - Riggio, David
AU - Biffi, Mauro
AU - Khan, Hafiza
AU - Silver, Marc T.
AU - Collier, Jack
AU - Eldadah, Zayd
AU - Wright, David J.
AU - Lande, Jeff D.
AU - Lexcen, Daniel R.
AU - Cheng, Alan
AU - Wilkoff, Bruce L.
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr. Tarakji reports receiving consulting fees and lecture fees from Medtronic and consulting fees from AliveCor; Dr. Mittal, receiving consulting fees from Abbott Laboratories, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic; Dr. Corey, receiving advisory board fees and consulting fees from Arsanis, ContraFect, Melinta Therapeutics, and Paratek Pharmaceuticals, consulting fees from Basilea Pharmaceutica, Bayer, Motif Bio, Quintiles, the Medicines Company, Theravance Biopharma, Cempra, Meiji Seika Pharma, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and scPharmaceuticals, advisory board fees from Pfizer and Tetraphase Pharmaceuti- cals, and fees for serving on an adjudication committee from Bio2 Medical and Novella Clinical; Dr. Poole, receiving lecture fees from Medtronic, advisory board fees from Boston Scientific, grant support and consulting fees from Kestra, and fees for serving on a trial committee from EBR Systems; Dr. Schloss, receiving consulting fees, lecture fees, and travel support from Medtronic and Boston Scientific; Dr. Pickett, receiving funding and technology instruction from Medtronic and grant support from Boston Scientific; Dr. Evonich, receiving funding, paid to his institution, and nonfinancial support from Medtronic, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, and Eli Lilly, funding, paid to his institution, from SentreHEART, Coherex Medical, and Hamilton Health Sciences through the Population Health Research Institute, funding, paid to his institution, nonfinancial support, and travel support from Boston Scientific, and nonfinancial support from Abbott Laboratories, Allergan, Biosense Webster, CorMatrix Cardiovascular, E.R. Squibb and Sons, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, Terumo Medical, Zoll Services, CVRx, Ekos, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Preventice Services, Roxwood Medical, and Siemens Medical Solutions USA; Dr. Philippon, receiving lecture fees and serving as a proctor for Medtronic; Dr. Biffi, receiving fees for an educational activity and fees for serving on a speakers bureau from Boston Scientific, Biotronik, and Medtronic; Dr. Khan, receiving fees for serving on a speakers bureau from Sanofi, Preventice Services, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, and Janssen and grant support, paid to Baylor Research Institute, from Medtronic; Dr. Silver, receiving fees for serving on a speakers bureau from Medtronic; Dr. Wright, receiving advisory board fees from Medtronic and grant support from Boston Scientific; Dr. Lande, being employed by Medtronic; Dr. Lexcen, being employed by and holding stock in Medtronic; Dr. Cheng, being employed by Medtronic; and Dr. Wilkoff, receiving consulting fees from Medtronic, Philips, and Abbott Laboratories. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Massachussetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/5/16
Y1 - 2019/5/16
N2 - Infections after placement of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. There is limited evidence on prophylactic strategies, other than the use of preoperative antibiotics, to prevent such infections. METHODS We conducted a randomized, controlled clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of an absorbable, antibiotic-eluting envelope in reducing the incidence of infection associated with CIED implantations. Patients who were undergoing a CIED pocket revision, generator replacement, or system upgrade or an initial implantation of a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive the envelope or not. Standard-of-care strategies to prevent infection were used in all patients. The primary end point was infection resulting in system extraction or revision, long-term antibiotic therapy with infection recurrence, or death, within 12 months after the CIED implantation procedure. The secondary end point for safety was procedure-related or system-related complications within 12 months. RESULTS A total of 6983 patients underwent randomization: 3495 to the envelope group and 3488 to the control group. The primary end point occurred in 25 patients in the envelope group and 42 patients in the control group (12-month Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate, 0.7% and 1.2%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36 to 0.98; P=0.04). The safety end point occurred in 201 patients in the envelope group and 236 patients in the control group (12-month Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate, 6.0% and 6.9%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.06; P<0.001 for noninferiority). The mean (±SD) duration of follow-up was 20.7±8.5 months. Major CIED-related infections through the entire follow-up period occurred in 32 patients in the envelope group and 51 patients in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.98). CONCLUSIONS Adjunctive use of an antibacterial envelope resulted in a significantly lower incidence of major CIED infections than standard-of-care infection-prevention strategies alone, without a higher incidence of complications.
AB - Infections after placement of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. There is limited evidence on prophylactic strategies, other than the use of preoperative antibiotics, to prevent such infections. METHODS We conducted a randomized, controlled clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of an absorbable, antibiotic-eluting envelope in reducing the incidence of infection associated with CIED implantations. Patients who were undergoing a CIED pocket revision, generator replacement, or system upgrade or an initial implantation of a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive the envelope or not. Standard-of-care strategies to prevent infection were used in all patients. The primary end point was infection resulting in system extraction or revision, long-term antibiotic therapy with infection recurrence, or death, within 12 months after the CIED implantation procedure. The secondary end point for safety was procedure-related or system-related complications within 12 months. RESULTS A total of 6983 patients underwent randomization: 3495 to the envelope group and 3488 to the control group. The primary end point occurred in 25 patients in the envelope group and 42 patients in the control group (12-month Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate, 0.7% and 1.2%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36 to 0.98; P=0.04). The safety end point occurred in 201 patients in the envelope group and 236 patients in the control group (12-month Kaplan-Meier estimated event rate, 6.0% and 6.9%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.06; P<0.001 for noninferiority). The mean (±SD) duration of follow-up was 20.7±8.5 months. Major CIED-related infections through the entire follow-up period occurred in 32 patients in the envelope group and 51 patients in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.98). CONCLUSIONS Adjunctive use of an antibacterial envelope resulted in a significantly lower incidence of major CIED infections than standard-of-care infection-prevention strategies alone, without a higher incidence of complications.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063807596&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063807596&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa1901111
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa1901111
M3 - Article
C2 - 30883056
AN - SCOPUS:85063807596
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 380
SP - 1895
EP - 1905
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 20
ER -