TY - JOUR
T1 - Annual and lifetime prevalence of partner abuse in a sample of female HMO enrollees
AU - Snow Jones, Alison
AU - Carlson Gielen, Andrea
AU - Campbell, Jacquelyn C.
AU - Schollenberger, Janet
AU - Dienemann, Jacqueline A.
AU - Kub, Joan
AU - O'Campo, Patricia J.
AU - Wynne, E. Clifford
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by U.S. Army Research Materiel and Command (USAMRMC), DAMD 17-96-1-6310/RCS DD-HA(OT)2068. Any errors are the authors’ own.
PY - 1999/11
Y1 - 1999/11
N2 - Self-reported data from a survey of roughly 1,100 female health maintenance organization enrollees in the Washington, DC, metropolitan area are used to investigate the lifetime and annual prevalence of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse by intimate partners. The sample consists of a racially balanced and, for the most part, well-educated group of working women. Three dimensions of abuse based on responses to questions from a modified version of the Abuse Assessment Screen are employed. In addition to simple descriptive analyses, logistic regression was performed. The estimated annual prevalence is lower than estimates reported in other studies. However, lifetime prevalence is very similar to estimates found in primary care clinical samples and somewhat higher than those derived from population-based surveys. More highly educated women report the lowest lifetime prevalence of intimate partner abuse. The finding that this sample of well-educated, middle-class working women has lifetime prevalence rates similar to those of women who are not as well off demonstrates that intimate partner abuse is not limited to disadvantaged women from vulnerable population subgroups. Copyright (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.
AB - Self-reported data from a survey of roughly 1,100 female health maintenance organization enrollees in the Washington, DC, metropolitan area are used to investigate the lifetime and annual prevalence of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse by intimate partners. The sample consists of a racially balanced and, for the most part, well-educated group of working women. Three dimensions of abuse based on responses to questions from a modified version of the Abuse Assessment Screen are employed. In addition to simple descriptive analyses, logistic regression was performed. The estimated annual prevalence is lower than estimates reported in other studies. However, lifetime prevalence is very similar to estimates found in primary care clinical samples and somewhat higher than those derived from population-based surveys. More highly educated women report the lowest lifetime prevalence of intimate partner abuse. The finding that this sample of well-educated, middle-class working women has lifetime prevalence rates similar to those of women who are not as well off demonstrates that intimate partner abuse is not limited to disadvantaged women from vulnerable population subgroups. Copyright (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032713379&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032713379&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1049-3867(99)00022-5
DO - 10.1016/S1049-3867(99)00022-5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0032713379
SN - 1049-3867
VL - 9
SP - 295
EP - 305
JO - Women's Health Issues
JF - Women's Health Issues
IS - 6
ER -