Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

An Updated Evidence Assessment of the Genetic Causes of Dilated Cardiomyopathy

  • Elizabeth Jordan
  • , Phoenix Grover
  • , Patricia Parker
  • , Jason Cowan
  • , Babken Asatryan
  • , Tomohiko Ai
  • , Akos Berthold
  • , Lucas Bronicki
  • , Emily Brown
  • , Rudy Celeghin
  • , Matthew Edwards
  • , Judith Fan
  • , Cynthia A. James
  • , Renee Johnson
  • , Daniel P. Judge
  • , Sean Jurgens
  • , Najim Lahrouchi
  • , Tom Lumbers
  • , Francesco Mazzarotto
  • , Argelia Medeiros Domingo
  • Brittney Murray, Stacey Peters, Kalliopi Pilichou, Alexandros Protonotarios, Karin van Spaendonck-Zwarts, Petros Syrris, Jessica Wang, Roddy Walsh, James S. Ware, Ray E. Hershberger

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: – Evidence of the diverse genetic architecture of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) continues to emerge and requires reassessment of the clinical relevance of implicated disease genes. Building on the 2019-2020 Clinical Genome Resource evaluation, the DCM gene curation expert panel reconvened in 2024-2025 to conduct a reassessment of genes in DCM. METHODS: – The Clinical Genome Resource semiquantitative clinical validity classification framework was applied with specifications to DCM to classify genes into categories on the basis of strength of published evidence for a DCM phenotype. Previously curated genes were reassessed, and newly reported gene–disease–mode of inheritance (MOI) relationships, termed “curations, ” were evaluated. RESULTS: – Sixty-eight genes were evaluated, inclusive of 72 unique gene-disease-MOI relationships across 51 previously evaluated and 17 newly assessed genes. Thirty-five curations were classified as high evidence (16 Definitive, 10 Strong, 9 Moderate), increasing by 16 from the prior assessment. Nine newly assessed genes were classified as high evidence: BAG5, FLII, LMOD2, MYLK3, MYZAP, NRAP, PPA2, PPP1R13L, and RPL3L. Twelve genes (11 newly appraised) were rated as high evidence with an autosomal recessive (AR) MOI. Five reevaluated genes from 2019-2020 had clinically significant changes in classification. Except for JPH2, for which curation was modified to separate autosomal dominant and AR MOI curations, clinically significant changes involved upgrades from low- to high-evidence categories (PLEKHM2, PRDM16, TBX20, TNNI3K), demonstrating the robustness of the Clinical Genome Resource gene curation process over time. An additional 29 gene-disease-MOI curations were classified as Limited, including 6 newly evaluated genes and 1 new MOI for a previously evaluated gene, MYBPC3-AR; 4 were classified as No Known Disease Relationship, and remained Disputed. Four previously evaluated genes were curated for both AD and AR MOIs: JPH2 (AD-Strong, AR-Limited), LDB3 (AD-Limited, AR-Strong), MYBPC3 (AD-Limited, AR-Limited), and TNNI3 (AD- and AR- Strong). CONCLUSIONS: – With substantial new evidence, the genetic architecture of DCM has rapidly expanded. This updated assessment of genes reported in DCM yielded 35 high-evidence curations, an increase from 19 only 5 years ago. The results of this evidence-based evaluation process inform clinical interpretation of genetic information in the care of DCM patients and families.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalCirculation
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2026

Keywords

  • dilated cardiomyopathy
  • gene curation
  • genetics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An Updated Evidence Assessment of the Genetic Causes of Dilated Cardiomyopathy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this