Amount of Training and Cue-Evoked Taste-Reactivity Responding in Reinforcer Devaluation

Peter C. Holland, Heather Lasseter, Isha Agarwal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

In two experiments, rats received minimal (16) pairings of one auditory conditioned stimulus (CS) cue with a sucrose reinforcer, and extensive (112) pairings of another auditory CS with that reinforcer. After sucrose was devalued by pairing it with lithium chloride in some rats (Devalue groups) but not others (Maintain groups), taste reactivity (TR) and other responses to unflavored water were assessed in the presence of the auditory CSs alone. The minimally trained CS controlled substantially more evaluative TR responses than the extensively trained CS. Those TR responses were hedonic (positive) in the Maintain groups, but aversive (negative) in the Devalue groups. By contrast, food cup entry and other responses thought not to reflect evaluative taste processing were controlled more by the extensively trained cue. These responses were reduced by sucrose devaluation comparably, regardless of the amount of training. The results suggest rapid changes in the content of learning as conditioning proceeds. Early in training, CSs may be capable of activating preevaluative processing of an absent food reinforcer that includes information about its palatability, but that capability is lost as training proceeds.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)119-132
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • associatively activated event representations
  • contents of learning
  • devaluation
  • taste reactivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Amount of Training and Cue-Evoked Taste-Reactivity Responding in Reinforcer Devaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this