TY - JOUR
T1 - Amide Proton Transfer Weighted MR Imaging for Predicting Meningioma Stiffness
T2 - A Feasibility Study
AU - Yu, Hao
AU - Zhu, Laimin
AU - Wang, Yanting
AU - Yue, Xiuzheng
AU - Wang, Weiwei
AU - Sun, Zhanguo
AU - Jiang, Shanshan
AU - Chen, Yueqin
AU - Wen, Zhibo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
PY - 2023/4
Y1 - 2023/4
N2 - Background: Stiffness of meningioma is an important factor affecting the surgical resection and the prognosis of patients. Purpose: To examine the feasibility of APTw-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluating meningioma stiffness. Study Type: Retrospective. Population: Seventy-one patient with meningiomas, 39 were male and 32 were female; the mean age was 51 ± 10 years. Field Strength/Sequence: 3.0T; Turbo-spin-echo T1-weighted and Gd-T1-weighted sequence; Turbo-spin-echo T2-weighted sequence; 2D fat-suppressed, turbo-spin-echo APTw pulse sequence. Assessment: The T1WI signal intensity score, T2WI signal intensity score, APTwmin, APTwmax, and APTwmean values were compared between soft, medium stiff and stiff meningiomas or non-stiff meningiomas and stiff meningiomas group. Statistical Tests: Chi-square test, one-way ANOVA analysis, independent-samples t-test, intra-class correlation coefficient, rank-sum test, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant in all tests. Results: APTwmin and APTwmean in the stiff group were significantly lower than that in the non-stiff group (2.79% ± 0.42% vs. 1.90% ± 0.60% and 3.20% ± 0.31% vs. 2.55% ± 0.61%). APTwmin and APTwmean in the stiff group were significantly lower than that in the medium stiff and soft groups (1.90% ± 0.60% vs. 2.69% ± 0.40% and 3.12% ± 0.32%, 2.55% ± 0.61% vs. 3.17% ± 0.33% and 3.39% ± 0.18%), APTwmin in the medium stiff group was significantly lower than in the soft group, there was no significant difference in APTwmean between the medium stiff and soft groups (P = 0.190). APTwmin showed the best diagnostic performance for evaluating meningioma stiffness with an area under the curve of 0.913, when the APTwmin was lower than 2.4%, the meningioma was defined as a stiff tumor, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 87.1%, 87.5%, and 85.9%, respectively. Data Conclusion: APTw-MRI could be used to evaluate meningioma stiffness, with APTwmin having the best evaluative efficiency. Level of Evidence: 3. Technical Efficacy: Stage 1.
AB - Background: Stiffness of meningioma is an important factor affecting the surgical resection and the prognosis of patients. Purpose: To examine the feasibility of APTw-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluating meningioma stiffness. Study Type: Retrospective. Population: Seventy-one patient with meningiomas, 39 were male and 32 were female; the mean age was 51 ± 10 years. Field Strength/Sequence: 3.0T; Turbo-spin-echo T1-weighted and Gd-T1-weighted sequence; Turbo-spin-echo T2-weighted sequence; 2D fat-suppressed, turbo-spin-echo APTw pulse sequence. Assessment: The T1WI signal intensity score, T2WI signal intensity score, APTwmin, APTwmax, and APTwmean values were compared between soft, medium stiff and stiff meningiomas or non-stiff meningiomas and stiff meningiomas group. Statistical Tests: Chi-square test, one-way ANOVA analysis, independent-samples t-test, intra-class correlation coefficient, rank-sum test, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant in all tests. Results: APTwmin and APTwmean in the stiff group were significantly lower than that in the non-stiff group (2.79% ± 0.42% vs. 1.90% ± 0.60% and 3.20% ± 0.31% vs. 2.55% ± 0.61%). APTwmin and APTwmean in the stiff group were significantly lower than that in the medium stiff and soft groups (1.90% ± 0.60% vs. 2.69% ± 0.40% and 3.12% ± 0.32%, 2.55% ± 0.61% vs. 3.17% ± 0.33% and 3.39% ± 0.18%), APTwmin in the medium stiff group was significantly lower than in the soft group, there was no significant difference in APTwmean between the medium stiff and soft groups (P = 0.190). APTwmin showed the best diagnostic performance for evaluating meningioma stiffness with an area under the curve of 0.913, when the APTwmin was lower than 2.4%, the meningioma was defined as a stiff tumor, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 87.1%, 87.5%, and 85.9%, respectively. Data Conclusion: APTw-MRI could be used to evaluate meningioma stiffness, with APTwmin having the best evaluative efficiency. Level of Evidence: 3. Technical Efficacy: Stage 1.
KW - amide proton transfer
KW - magnetic resonance imaging
KW - meningioma
KW - stiffness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135444384&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85135444384&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jmri.28379
DO - 10.1002/jmri.28379
M3 - Article
C2 - 35932167
AN - SCOPUS:85135444384
SN - 1053-1807
VL - 57
SP - 1071
EP - 1078
JO - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
JF - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
IS - 4
ER -