TY - JOUR
T1 - Albiglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (Harmony Outcomes)
T2 - a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial
AU - Harmony Outcomes committees and investigators
AU - Hernandez, Adrian F.
AU - Green, Jennifer B.
AU - Janmohamed, Salim
AU - D'Agostino, Ralph B.
AU - Granger, Christopher B.
AU - Jones, Nigel P.
AU - Leiter, Lawrence A.
AU - Rosenberg, Anne E.
AU - Sigmon, Kristina N.
AU - Somerville, Matthew C.
AU - Thorpe, Karl M.
AU - McMurray, John J.V.
AU - Del Prato, Stefano
AU - Califf, Robert M.
AU - Holman, Rury
AU - DeMets, David
AU - Riddle, Matthew
AU - Goodman, Shaun
AU - McGuire, Darren
AU - Alexander, Karen
AU - Devore, Adam
AU - Melloni, Chiara
AU - Patel, Chetan
AU - Kong, David
AU - Bloomfield, Gerald
AU - Roe, Matthew
AU - Tricoci, Pierluigi
AU - Harrison, Rob
AU - Lopes, Renato
AU - Mathews, Robin
AU - Mehta, Rajendra
AU - Schuyler Jones, William
AU - Vemulapalli, Sreekanth
AU - Povsic, Thomas
AU - Eapen, Zubin
AU - Dombrowski, Keith
AU - Kolls, Brad
AU - Jordan, Dedrick
AU - Ambrosy, Andrew
AU - Greene, Stephen
AU - Mandawat, Aditya
AU - Shavadia, Jay
AU - Cooper, Lauren
AU - Sharma, Abhinav
AU - Guimaraes, Patricia
AU - Friedman, Daniel
AU - Wilson, Matt
AU - Endsley, Patricia
AU - Gentry, Tracy
AU - Al Kawas, Firas
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by GlaxoSmithKline Research & Development (GSK). Details of the trial organisation and a complete list of the investigators are provided in appendix 1 . The statistical analyses were done by a contract research organisation on behalf of the sponsor, according to a prespecified plan, and corroborated by Duke Clinical Research Institute. The statistical analysis plan is available in appendix 1 . We thank Yuliya Lokhnygina (Duke Clinical Research Institute) for statistical support and supervision; Drusilla Noronha, Rachael Russell, and Murray Stewart (current or former GSK employees) for their assistance in protocol development, trial conduct, and other scientific input; and the trial participants, investigators, trial site staff, and the employees and contractors of the sponsor who were involved in the conduct of the trial.
Funding Information:
AFH reports grants to his institution from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Merck, Portola Pharmaceuticals, and Verily; and he has been a consultant for AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Novartis, and Merck. JBG reports grants to her institution from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and GlaxoSmithKline; and she has been consultant for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, and Merck. SJ, NPJ, and KMT are GlaxoSmithKline employees and shareholders. RBD'A is a consultant for GlaxoSmithKline (for the Harmony Outcomes trial). CBG reports grants to his institution from Apple, Armetheon, Daiichi Sankyo, the US Food and Drug Administration, and AstraZeneca; and reports consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Medtronic, the National Institutes of Health, Novartis, Pfizer, AbbVie, Boston Scientific, Gilead Sciences, Medscape, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Rho, Roche Diagnostics, Sirtex Medical, and Verseon. LAL reports grants to his institution from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and Company, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi; he reports honoraria for presentation from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and Servier; and he reports participation on advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and Servier. AER reports grants to her institution from GlaxoSmithKline. KNS reports grants to her institution from GlaxoSmithKline and CSL Behring. MCS is a former employee of and shareholder in GlaxoSmithKline and is an employee of PAREXEL International. JJVM reports grants to his institution from Boehringer Ingelheim and Bristol-Myers Squibb, consultancy fees to his institution from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cardurion Pharmaceuticals, DalCor Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Novartis, and Theracos, and honoraria to his institution for presentations from AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Pfizer. SDP reports grants to his institution from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, and Novartis; he reports honoraria for presentations from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals; and he reports participation in advisory boards for Abbott Laboratories, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly and Company, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Mundipharma, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Servier, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/10/27
Y1 - 2018/10/27
N2 - Background: Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists differ in chemical structure, duration of action, and in their effects on clinical outcomes. The cardiovascular effects of once-weekly albiglutide in type 2 diabetes are unknown. We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of albiglutide in preventing cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Methods: We did a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial in 610 sites across 28 countries. We randomly assigned patients aged 40 years and older with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (at a 1:1 ratio) to groups that either received a subcutaneous injection of albiglutide (30–50 mg, based on glycaemic response and tolerability) or of a matched volume of placebo once a week, in addition to their standard care. Investigators used an interactive voice or web response system to obtain treatment assignment, and patients and all study investigators were masked to their treatment allocation. We hypothesised that albiglutide would be non-inferior to placebo for the primary outcome of the first occurrence of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, which was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. If non-inferiority was confirmed by an upper limit of the 95% CI for a hazard ratio of less than 1·30, closed testing for superiority was prespecified. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02465515. Findings: Patients were screened between July 1, 2015, and Nov 24, 2016. 10 793 patients were screened and 9463 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to groups: 4731 patients were assigned to receive albiglutide and 4732 patients to receive placebo. On Nov 8, 2017, it was determined that 611 primary endpoints and a median follow-up of at least 1·5 years had accrued, and participants returned for a final visit and discontinuation from study treatment; the last patient visit was on March 12, 2018. These 9463 patients, the intention-to-treat population, were evaluated for a median duration of 1·6 years and were assessed for the primary outcome. The primary composite outcome occurred in 338 (7%) of 4731 patients at an incidence rate of 4·6 events per 100 person-years in the albiglutide group and in 428 (9%) of 4732 patients at an incidence rate of 5·9 events per 100 person-years in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·78, 95% CI 0·68–0·90), which indicated that albiglutide was superior to placebo (p<0·0001 for non-inferiority; p=0·0006 for superiority). The incidence of acute pancreatitis (ten patients in the albiglutide group and seven patients in the placebo group), pancreatic cancer (six patients in the albiglutide group and five patients in the placebo group), medullary thyroid carcinoma (zero patients in both groups), and other serious adverse events did not differ between the two groups. There were three (<1%) deaths in the placebo group that were assessed by investigators, who were masked to study drug assignment, to be treatment-related and two (<1%) deaths in the albiglutide group. Interpretation: In patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, albiglutide was superior to placebo with respect to major adverse cardiovascular events. Evidence-based glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists should therefore be considered as part of a comprehensive strategy to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes. Funding: GlaxoSmithKline.
AB - Background: Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists differ in chemical structure, duration of action, and in their effects on clinical outcomes. The cardiovascular effects of once-weekly albiglutide in type 2 diabetes are unknown. We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of albiglutide in preventing cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Methods: We did a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial in 610 sites across 28 countries. We randomly assigned patients aged 40 years and older with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (at a 1:1 ratio) to groups that either received a subcutaneous injection of albiglutide (30–50 mg, based on glycaemic response and tolerability) or of a matched volume of placebo once a week, in addition to their standard care. Investigators used an interactive voice or web response system to obtain treatment assignment, and patients and all study investigators were masked to their treatment allocation. We hypothesised that albiglutide would be non-inferior to placebo for the primary outcome of the first occurrence of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, which was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. If non-inferiority was confirmed by an upper limit of the 95% CI for a hazard ratio of less than 1·30, closed testing for superiority was prespecified. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02465515. Findings: Patients were screened between July 1, 2015, and Nov 24, 2016. 10 793 patients were screened and 9463 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to groups: 4731 patients were assigned to receive albiglutide and 4732 patients to receive placebo. On Nov 8, 2017, it was determined that 611 primary endpoints and a median follow-up of at least 1·5 years had accrued, and participants returned for a final visit and discontinuation from study treatment; the last patient visit was on March 12, 2018. These 9463 patients, the intention-to-treat population, were evaluated for a median duration of 1·6 years and were assessed for the primary outcome. The primary composite outcome occurred in 338 (7%) of 4731 patients at an incidence rate of 4·6 events per 100 person-years in the albiglutide group and in 428 (9%) of 4732 patients at an incidence rate of 5·9 events per 100 person-years in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·78, 95% CI 0·68–0·90), which indicated that albiglutide was superior to placebo (p<0·0001 for non-inferiority; p=0·0006 for superiority). The incidence of acute pancreatitis (ten patients in the albiglutide group and seven patients in the placebo group), pancreatic cancer (six patients in the albiglutide group and five patients in the placebo group), medullary thyroid carcinoma (zero patients in both groups), and other serious adverse events did not differ between the two groups. There were three (<1%) deaths in the placebo group that were assessed by investigators, who were masked to study drug assignment, to be treatment-related and two (<1%) deaths in the albiglutide group. Interpretation: In patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, albiglutide was superior to placebo with respect to major adverse cardiovascular events. Evidence-based glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists should therefore be considered as part of a comprehensive strategy to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes. Funding: GlaxoSmithKline.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055101508&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055101508&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32261-X
DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32261-X
M3 - Article
C2 - 30291013
AN - SCOPUS:85055101508
SN - 0140-6736
VL - 392
SP - 1519
EP - 1529
JO - The Lancet
JF - The Lancet
IS - 10157
ER -