Aggregated spatial intensity as a method for estimating point-level exposures within area-level units: The case of tobacco retailer exposure in census tracts

Madeline M. Brooks, Scott D. Siegel, Anne E. Corrigan, Frank C. Curriero

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Aggregating point-level events to area-level units can produce misleading interpretations when displayed via choropleth maps. We developed the aggregated intensity method to share point-level location information across unit boundaries prior to aggregation. This method was applied to tobacco retailers among census tracts in New Castle County, DE. Methods: Aggregated intensity uses kernel density estimation to generate spatially continuous expected counts of events per unit area, then aggregates these results to area-level units. We calculated a relative difference measure to compare aggregated intensity to observed counts. Results: Aggregated intensity produces estimates of event exposure unconstrained by boundaries. The relative difference between aggregated intensity and counts is greater for units with many events proximal to their borders. The appropriateness of aggregated intensity depends on events’ spatial influence and proximity to unit boundaries, as well as computational inputs. Conclusions: Aggregated intensity may facilitate more spatially realistic estimates of exposure to point-level events.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number100482
JournalSpatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology
Volume41
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2022

Keywords

  • Choropleth map
  • Exposure
  • Kernel density estimation
  • Spatial intensity
  • Tobacco retail

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Epidemiology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Aggregated spatial intensity as a method for estimating point-level exposures within area-level units: The case of tobacco retailer exposure in census tracts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this