TY - JOUR
T1 - Age-related differences in movement control
T2 - Adjusting submovement structure to optimize performance
AU - Walker, Neff
AU - Philbin, David A.
AU - Fisk, Arthur D.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1997/1
Y1 - 1997/1
N2 - In this experiment older and younger adults were compared on their ability to position a cursor with an electromechanical mouse. Distance of the movement, size of the target, and relative emphasis on the speed or accuracy of the movement were manipulated. The study was designed to isolate and evaluate the effects of age-related differences in the noise-to-force ratio, perceptual feedback efficiency, strategy differences, and the ability to produce force as explanations for age-related differences in movement control. This was done by using two types of movement tasks and by analyzing movement performance according to stages of movement. The study showed that all four factors, when isolated, are significantly different for the two age groups. However, in the task component where all factors could simultaneously affect performance, the age-related difference in performance was less than the difference in either the measure of noise-to-force ratio or perceptual efficiency. Analysis of the submovement structure revealed how older adults compensated for the greater noise and less perceptual efficiency by adjusting the velocity and number of submovements. These findings are discussed in light of the optimized submovement model.
AB - In this experiment older and younger adults were compared on their ability to position a cursor with an electromechanical mouse. Distance of the movement, size of the target, and relative emphasis on the speed or accuracy of the movement were manipulated. The study was designed to isolate and evaluate the effects of age-related differences in the noise-to-force ratio, perceptual feedback efficiency, strategy differences, and the ability to produce force as explanations for age-related differences in movement control. This was done by using two types of movement tasks and by analyzing movement performance according to stages of movement. The study showed that all four factors, when isolated, are significantly different for the two age groups. However, in the task component where all factors could simultaneously affect performance, the age-related difference in performance was less than the difference in either the measure of noise-to-force ratio or perceptual efficiency. Analysis of the submovement structure revealed how older adults compensated for the greater noise and less perceptual efficiency by adjusting the velocity and number of submovements. These findings are discussed in light of the optimized submovement model.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031017024&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031017024&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/geronb/52b.1.p40
DO - 10.1093/geronb/52b.1.p40
M3 - Article
C2 - 9008674
AN - SCOPUS:0031017024
SN - 1079-5014
VL - 52
SP - P40-P52
JO - Journals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
JF - Journals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
IS - 1
ER -