TY - JOUR
T1 - Acute postoperative bacterial endophthalmitis
AU - Campochiaro, P. A.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by PHS Grant EY05951 and Core Grant P30EY–01765 from the National Eye Institute and a Lew R. Wasserman Merit Award and an Unrestricted Grant from Research to Prevent Blindness Inc., New York, NY.
PY - 1999
Y1 - 1999
N2 - The EVS has provided important background data and has helped to guide treatment in patients with postoperative endophthalmitis. In addition to its two main conclusions that immediate vitrectomy is indicated in patients that present with LP vision, but not those that present with vision of hand movement or better, and that systemic amikacin and ceftazidime provide no benefit, the EVS has provided information leading to additional suggestions: (1) both vitreous and anterior chamber specimens should be obtained for cultures and Gram stain; (2) the current treatment approach does not eradicate infection in a substantial number of patients, and, therefore, new approaches should be sought; (3) even if a second set of intravitreous antibiotics are needed to eliminate the infection, good vision is still possible, and therefore an aggressive approach is justified; (4) presenting vision of LP or a positive gram stain portend a poor visual prognosis and a substantial chance of persistent infection after the first procedure and, therefore, the threshold for additional intervention should be lowered; and (5) signs of worsening inflammation after the first post-treatment day suggest persistent infection, and additional cultures should be done and intravitreous antibiotics should be injected. If the patient has not had vitrectomy, it should be performed. The EVS did not deal with the choice of antibiotics, but because of other information indicating that there is substantial risk associated with the use of amikacin, vancomycin and ceftazidime should be used for intravitreous injections.
AB - The EVS has provided important background data and has helped to guide treatment in patients with postoperative endophthalmitis. In addition to its two main conclusions that immediate vitrectomy is indicated in patients that present with LP vision, but not those that present with vision of hand movement or better, and that systemic amikacin and ceftazidime provide no benefit, the EVS has provided information leading to additional suggestions: (1) both vitreous and anterior chamber specimens should be obtained for cultures and Gram stain; (2) the current treatment approach does not eradicate infection in a substantial number of patients, and, therefore, new approaches should be sought; (3) even if a second set of intravitreous antibiotics are needed to eliminate the infection, good vision is still possible, and therefore an aggressive approach is justified; (4) presenting vision of LP or a positive gram stain portend a poor visual prognosis and a substantial chance of persistent infection after the first procedure and, therefore, the threshold for additional intervention should be lowered; and (5) signs of worsening inflammation after the first post-treatment day suggest persistent infection, and additional cultures should be done and intravitreous antibiotics should be injected. If the patient has not had vitrectomy, it should be performed. The EVS did not deal with the choice of antibiotics, but because of other information indicating that there is substantial risk associated with the use of amikacin, vancomycin and ceftazidime should be used for intravitreous injections.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033004457&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033004457&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0896-1549(05)70151-6
DO - 10.1016/S0896-1549(05)70151-6
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0033004457
SN - 0896-1549
VL - 12
SP - 83
EP - 88
JO - Ophthalmology Clinics of North America
JF - Ophthalmology Clinics of North America
IS - 1
ER -